Literature DB >> 17125959

Surgeon volume and postoperative mortality after oesophagectomy for cancer.

I Rouvelas1, C Jia, P Viklund, M Lindblad, J Lagergren.   

Abstract

AIM: Oesophagectomy remains the curative treatment of choice for patients with localised oesophageal or cardia cancer, but severe postoperative complications are common. Our aim was to assess the association between surgeon volume and postoperative mortality after oesophagectomy.
METHODS: Prospective, population-based study of Swedish residents diagnosed with oesophageal or cardia cancer, treated with oesophagectomy during the period April 2001 through December 2005. Details concerning patients, tumours, and surgery were collected from the Swedish Oesophageal and Cardia Cancer register. All 607 patients registered during the study period were included in the study. Risk of mortality 30 and 90 days after oesophagectomy was assessed using multivariable logistic regression, expressed in odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for relevant covariates.
RESULTS: The 30-day mortality in low-, medium-, and high-volume surgeon groups were 7.1%, 2.1%, and 2.6%, respectively. The corresponding 90-day figures were 11.4%, 4.8%, and 8.9%. Adjusted ORs for 30- and 90-day mortality were decreased non-significantly by 58% and 14%, respectively, among patients in the high-volume group, compared to the low-volume group (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.10-1.80; OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.31-2.38). The mortality rates differed considerably between individual high-volume surgeons, but without any trend of further decreased risk with increasing volume among these surgeons (p values for trend 0.84 and 0.80 for 30- and 90-day mortality, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Patients with resectable oesophageal cancer should be advised to choose a high-volume surgeon, but they should also be aware that differences among individual surgeons might further affect survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17125959     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.10.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  6 in total

1.  Outcomes of esophagectomy according to surgeon's training: general vs. thoracic.

Authors:  Brian R Smith; Marcelo W Hinojosa; Kevin M Reavis; Ninh T Nguyen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Hospital type- and volume-outcome relationships in esophageal cancer patients receiving non-surgical treatments.

Authors:  Po-Kuei Hsu; Hui-Shan Chen; Bing-Yen Wang; Shiao-Chi Wu; Chao-Yu Liu; Chih-Hsun Shih; Chia-Chuan Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Surgeon Volume Correlates with Reduced Mortality and Improved Quality in the Surgical Management of Diverticulitis.

Authors:  Rachelle N Damle; Julie M Flahive; Jennifer S Davids; W Brian Sweeney; Paul R Sturrock; Justin A Maykel; Karim Alavi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Surgery for oesophageal cancer at Galway University Hospital 1993-2008.

Authors:  K H Chang; O J McAnena; M J Smith; R R Salman; M F Khan; D Lowe
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Mortality after esophageal and gastric cancer resection.

Authors:  Ugo Fedeli; Elena Schievano; Manola Lisiero
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Surgery versus radical endotherapies for early cancer and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  Cathy Bennett; Susi Green; John DeCaestecker; Max Almond; Hugh Barr; Pradeep Bhandari; Krish Ragunath; Rajvinder Singh; Janusz Jankowski
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.