Literature DB >> 17125891

The development of national competency standards for the midwife in Australia.

Caroline S E Homer1, Lyn Passant, Sue Kildea, Jan Pincombe, Carol Thorogood, Nicky Leap, Pat M Brodie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to develop and validate national competency standards for midwives in Australia. This study was part of a commissioned national research project to articulate the scope of practice of Australian midwives and to develop national competency standards to assist midwives to deliver safe and competent midwifery care.
DESIGN: a multi-method, staged approach was used to collect data through a literature review, workshop consultations, interviews, surveys and written submissions in order to develop national competency standards for Australian midwives. Subsequently, direct observation of practice in a range of settings ensured validation of the competencies.
SETTING: maternity-care settings in each state and territory in Australia. PARTICIPANTS: midwives, other health professionals and consumers of midwifery care.
FINDINGS: The national competency standards for the midwife were developed through research and consultation before being validated in practice. KEY
CONCLUSIONS: the national competency standards are currently being implemented into education, regulation and practice in Australia. These will be minimum competency standards required of all midwives who seek authority to practise as a midwife in Australia. It is expected that all midwives will demonstrate that they are able to meet the competency standards relevant to the position they hold. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: the competency standards establish a national standard for midwives and reinforce responsibility and accountability in the provision of quality midwifery care through safe and effective practice. In addition, individual midwives may use the competency standards as the basis of their ongoing professional development plans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17125891     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2006.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  5 in total

1.  Accelerated Training of Skilled Birth Attendants in a Marginalized Population on the Thai-Myanmar Border: A Multiple Methods Program Evaluation.

Authors:  Adrienne Lynne White; Thaw Htwe Min; Mechthild M Gross; Ladda Kajeechiwa; May Myo Thwin; Borimas Hanboonkunupakarn; Hla Hla Than; Thet Wai Zin; Marcus J Rijken; Gabie Hoogenboom; Rose McGready
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A critical interpretive synthesis of the roles of midwives in health systems.

Authors:  Cristina A Mattison; John N Lavis; Michael G Wilson; Eileen K Hutton; Michelle L Dion
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2020-07-08

3.  How is organisational fit addressed in Australian entry level midwifery job advertisements.

Authors:  Dianne Bloxsome; Courtney Glass; Sara Bayes
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Does patient and public involvement influence the development of competency frameworks for the health professions? A systematic review.

Authors:  Nicole Murray; Claire Palermo; Alan Batt; Kristie Bell
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-26

5.  Effects of midwife-led maternity services on postpartum wellbeing and clinical outcomes in primiparous women under China's one-child policy.

Authors:  Jing Hua; Liping Zhu; Li Du; Yu Li; Zhuochun Wu; Da Wo; Wenchong Du
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.