Literature DB >> 17125804

Effects of tick population dynamics and host densities on the persistence of tick-borne infections.

Roberto Rosà1, Andrea Pugliese.   

Abstract

The transmission and the persistence of tick-borne infections are strongly influenced by the densities and the structure of host populations. By extending previous models and analysis, in this paper we analyse how the persistence of ticks and pathogens, is affected by the dynamics of tick populations, and by their host densities. The effect of host densities on infection persistence is explored through the analysis and simulation of a series of models that include different assumptions on tick-host dynamics and consider different routes of infection transmission. Ticks are assumed to feed on two types of host species which vary in their reservoir competence. Too low densities of competent hosts (i.e., hosts where transmission can occur) do not sustain the infection cycle, while too high densities of incompetent hosts may dilute the competent hosts so much to make infection persistence impossible. A dilution effect may occur also for competent hosts as a consequence of reduced tick to host ratio; this is possible only if the regulation of tick populations is such that tick density does not increase linearly with host densities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17125804     DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2006.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Math Biosci        ISSN: 0025-5564            Impact factor:   2.144


  25 in total

1.  Delay differential systems for tick population dynamics.

Authors:  Guihong Fan; Horst R Thieme; Huaiping Zhu
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  The role of game (wild boar and roe deer) in the spread of tick-borne encephalitis in the Czech Republic.

Authors:  Bohumir Kriz; Milan Daniel; Cestmir Benes; Marek Maly
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.133

3.  How ticks keep ticking in the adversity of host immune reactions.

Authors:  Rachel Jennings; Yang Kuang; Horst R Thieme; Jianhong Wu; Xiaotian Wu
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  Lyme disease risk not amplified in a species-poor vertebrate community: similar Borrelia burgdorferi tick infection prevalence and OspC genotype frequencies.

Authors:  S L States; R J Brinkerhoff; G Carpi; T K Steeves; C Folsom-O'Keefe; M DeVeaux; M A Diuk-Wasser
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.342

5.  Determinants of tick-borne encephalitis in counties of southern Germany, 2001-2008.

Authors:  Christian Kiffner; Walter Zucchini; Philipp Schomaker; Torsten Vor; Peter Hagedorn; Matthias Niedrig; Ferdinand Rühe
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 3.918

6.  Modeling the invasion and establishment of a tick-borne pathogen.

Authors:  Azmy S Ackleh; Amy Veprauskas
Journal:  Ecol Modell       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.512

7.  Persistence of pathogens with short infectious periods in seasonal tick populations: the relative importance of three transmission routes.

Authors:  Etsuko Nonaka; Gregory D Ebel; Helen J Wearing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Persistent oscillations and backward bifurcation in a malaria model with varying human and mosquito populations: implications for control.

Authors:  Calistus N Ngonghala; Miranda I Teboh-Ewungkem; Gideon A Ngwa
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 2.259

9.  Modelling transmission of vector-borne pathogens shows complex dynamics when vector feeding sites are limited.

Authors:  Arik Kershenbaum; Lewi Stone; Richard S Ostfeld; Leon Blaustein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evidence of the importance of host habitat use in predicting the dilution effect of wild boar for deer exposure to Anaplasma spp.

Authors:  Agustín Estrada-Peña; Pelayo Acevedo; Francisco Ruiz-Fons; Christian Gortázar; José de la Fuente
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.