Literature DB >> 17125185

SMIREP: predicting chemical activity from SMILES.

Andreas Karwath1, Luc De Raedt.   

Abstract

Most approaches to structure-activity-relationship (SAR) prediction proceed in two steps. In the first step, a typically large set of fingerprints, or fragments of interest, is constructed (either by hand or by some recent data mining techniques). In the second step, machine learning techniques are applied to obtain a predictive model. The result is often not only a highly accurate but also hard to interpret model. In this paper, we demonstrate the capabilities of a novel SAR algorithm, SMIREP, which tightly integrates the fragment and model generation steps and which yields simple models in the form of a small set of IF-THEN rules. These rules contain SMILES fragments, which are easy to understand to the computational chemist. SMIREP combines ideas from the well-known IREP rule learner with a novel fragmentation algorithm for SMILES strings. SMIREP has been evaluated on three problems: the prediction of binding activities for the estrogen receptor (Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Distributed Structure-Searchable Toxicity (DSSTox) National Center for Toxicological Research estrogen receptor (NCTRER) Database), the prediction of mutagenicity using the carcinogenic potency database (CPDB), and the prediction of biodegradability on a subset of the Environmental Fate Database (EFDB). In these applications, SMIREP has the advantage of producing easily interpretable rules while having predictive accuracies that are comparable to those of alternative state-of-the-art techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17125185     DOI: 10.1021/ci060159g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  5 in total

1.  The development of a knowledge base for basic active structures: an example case of dopamine agonists.

Authors:  Takashi Okada; Masumi Yamakawa; Norihito Ohmori; Sachio Mori; Hiroshi Horikawa; Taketo Hayashi; Satoshi Fujishima
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2010-01-23       Impact factor: 4.215

2.  Open Babel: An open chemical toolbox.

Authors:  Noel M O'Boyle; Michael Banck; Craig A James; Chris Morley; Tim Vandermeersch; Geoffrey R Hutchison
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.514

3.  Filtered circular fingerprints improve either prediction or runtime performance while retaining interpretability.

Authors:  Martin Gütlein; Stefan Kramer
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 5.514

4.  Chiral Brønsted Acid-Catalyzed Enantioselective α-Amidoalkylation Reactions: A Joint Experimental and Predictive Study.

Authors:  Eider Aranzamendi; Sonia Arrasate; Nuria Sotomayor; Humberto González-Díaz; Esther Lete
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.911

Review 5.  Bacteria as computers making computers.

Authors:  Antoine Danchin
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 16.408

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.