Literature DB >> 17125165

Analysis of data fusion methods in virtual screening: similarity and group fusion.

Martin Whittle1, Valerie J Gillet, Peter Willett, Jens Loesel.   

Abstract

In a recent companion paper we have related the operation of simple data fusion rules used in virtual screening to a multiple integral formalism. In this paper we extend these ideas to the analysis of data fusion methods applied to real data. We examine several cases of similarity fusion using different coefficients and different representations and consider the reasons for positive or negative results in terms of the similarity distributions. Results are obtained using the SUM-, MAX- MIN-, and CombMNZ-fusion rules. We also develop a customized fusion rule, which provides an estimate of the optimal possible result for fusing multiple searches of a specific database; this shows that similarity fusion can, in principle, achieve retrieval enhancements even if this is not achieved in practice with current fusion rules. The methods are extended to analyze the comparatively successful results of group fusion with multiple actives, and we provide a rationale for the observed superiority of the MAX-rule over the SUM-rule in this context.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17125165     DOI: 10.1021/ci0496144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  13 in total

1.  Integrating computational and mixture-based screening of combinatorial libraries.

Authors:  Austin B Yongye; Clemencia Pinilla; Jose L Medina-Franco; Marc A Giulianotti; Colette T Dooley; Jon R Appel; Adel Nefzi; Thomas Scior; Richard A Houghten; Karina Martínez-Mayorga
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Comparison of structure fingerprint and molecular interaction field based methods in explaining biological similarity of small molecules in cell-based screens.

Authors:  Pekka Tiikkainen; Antti Poso; Olli Kallioniemi
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Quantifying structure and performance diversity for sets of small molecules comprising small-molecule screening collections.

Authors:  Paul A Clemons; J Anthony Wilson; Vlado Dančík; Sandrine Muller; Hyman A Carrinski; Bridget K Wagner; Angela N Koehler; Stuart L Schreiber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Molecular Scaffold Hopping via Holistic Molecular Representation.

Authors:  Francesca Grisoni; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

5.  Consensus queries in ligand-based virtual screening experiments.

Authors:  Francois Berenger; Oanh Vu; Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 5.514

6.  Brainstorming: weighted voting prediction of inhibitors for protein targets.

Authors:  Dariusz Plewczynski
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  Exploring Structure-Activity Data Using the Landscape Paradigm.

Authors:  Rajarshi Guha
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2012-11

8.  Voting-based consensus clustering for combining multiple clusterings of chemical structures.

Authors:  Faisal Saeed; Naomie Salim; Ammar Abdo
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 5.514

Review 9.  Fusing similarity rankings in ligand-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Peter Willett
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 7.271

10.  Enhanced ranking of PknB Inhibitors using data fusion methods.

Authors:  Abhik Seal; Perumal Yogeeswari; Dharmaranjan Sriram; David J Wild
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.514

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.