Literature DB >> 17124894

Comparison of wavefront reconstructions with Zernike polynomials and Fourier transforms.

Guang-Ming Dai1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To make a direct comparison between Fourier and Zernike reconstructions of ocular wavefronts using a newly available analytical theory by which Fourier coefficients can be converted to Zernike coefficients and vice versa.
METHODS: Noise-free random wavefronts were simulated with up to the 15th order of Zernike polynomials. For each case, 100 random wavefronts were simulated separately. These wavefronts were smoothed with a low-pass Gaussian filter to remove edge effects. Wavefront slopes were calculated, and normally distributed random noise was added within the circular area to simulate realistic Shack-Hartmann spot patterns. Three wavefront reconstruction methods were performed. The wavefront surface error was calculated as the percentage of the input wavefront root mean square.
RESULTS: Fourier full reconstruction was more accurate than Zernike reconstruction from the 6th to the 10th orders for low-to-moderate noise levels. Fourier reconstruction was found to be approximately 100 times faster than Zernike reconstruction. Fourier reconstruction always makes optimal use of information. For Zernike reconstruction, however, the optimal number of orders must be chosen manually. The optimal Zernike order for Zernike reconstruction is lower for smaller pupils than larger pupils.
CONCLUSIONS: Fourier full reconstruction is faster and more accurate than Zernike reconstruction, makes optimal use of slope information, and better represents ocular aberrations of highly aberrated eyes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17124894     DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-20061101-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of Zernike and Fourier wavefront reconstruction algorithms in representing corneal aberration of normal and abnormal eyes.

Authors:  Geunyoung Yoon; Seth Pantanelli; Scott MacRae
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of Low Degree/High Degree and Zernike Expansions for Evaluating Simulation Outcomes After Customized Aspheric Laser Corrections.

Authors:  Damien Gatinel; Jacques Malet; Laurent Dumas; Dimitri T Azar
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Analysis of four aberrometers for evaluating lower and higher order aberrations.

Authors:  Fabiano Cade; Andrea Cruzat; Eleftherios I Paschalis; Lilian Espírito Santo; Roberto Pineda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Multi-beam array stitching method based on scanning Hartmann for imaging quality evaluation of large space telescopes.

Authors:  Haisong Wei; Haixiang Hu; Feng Yan; Xindong Chen; Qiang Cheng; Donglin Xue; Xuejun Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.