Literature DB >> 17123581

Removal of a broad range of surfactants from municipal wastewater--comparison between membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment.

Susana González1, Mira Petrovic, Damià Barceló.   

Abstract

Elimination of alkylphenol ethoxylates (APEO) and their degradation products (alkylphenols and alkylphenoxy carboxylates), as well as linear alkylbenzene sulfonates (LAS) and coconut diethanol amides (CDEA), was studied in a pilot plant membrane bioreactor (MBR) working in parallel to a full-scale wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) using conventional activated sludge (CAS). In the CAS system 87% of parent long ethoxy chain NPEOs were eliminated, but their decomposition yielded persistent acidic and neutral metabolites which were poorly removed. The elimination of short ethoxy chain NPEOs (NP(1)EO and NP(2)EO) averaged 50%, whereas nonylphenoxy carboxylates (NPECs) showed an increase in concentrations with respect to the ones measured in influent samples. Nonylphenol (NP) was the only nonylphenolic compound efficiently removed (96%) in the CAS treatment. On the other hand, MBR showed good performance in removing nonylphenolic compounds with an overall elimination of 94% for the total pool of NPEO derived compounds (in comparison of 54%-overall elimination in the CAS). The elimination of individual compounds in the MBR was as follows: 97% for parent, long ethoxy chain NPEOs, 90% for short ethoxy chain NPEOs, 73% for NPECs, and 96% for NP. Consequently, the residual concentrations were in the low mug/l level or below it. LAS and CDEA showed similar elimination in the both wastewater treatment systems that were investigated, and no significant differences were observed between the two treatment processes. Nevertheless, for all studied compounds the MBR effluent concentrations were consistently lower and independent of the influent concentrations. Additionally, MBR effluent quality in terms of chemical oxygen demand (COD), NH(4)(+) concentration and total suspended solids (TSS) was always superior to the ones of the CAS and also independent of the influent quality, which demonstrates high potential of MBRs in the treatment of municipal wastewaters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17123581     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.09.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  12 in total

1.  High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Identification of Novel Surfactant-Derived Sulfur-Containing Disinfection Byproducts from Gas Extraction Wastewater.

Authors:  Hannah K Liberatore; Danielle C Westerman; Joshua M Allen; Michael J Plewa; Elizabeth D Wagner; Amy M McKenna; Chad R Weisbrod; James P McCord; Richard J Liberatore; David B Burnett; Leslie H Cizmas; Susan D Richardson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  A comparison between two full-scale MBR and CAS municipal wastewater treatment plants: techno-economic-environmental assessment.

Authors:  Giorgio Bertanza; Matteo Canato; Giuseppe Laera; Mentore Vaccari; Magdalena Svanström; Sara Heimersson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Characterization and comparison of bacterial communities selected in conventional activated sludge and membrane bioreactor pilot plants: a focus on Nitrospira and Planctomycetes bacterial phyla.

Authors:  Carolina Chiellini; Giulio Munz; Giulio Petroni; Claudio Lubello; Gualtiero Mori; Franco Verni; Claudia Vannini
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Occurrence of endocrine disrupters and selected pharmaceuticals in Aisonas River (Greece) and environmental risk assessment using hazard indexes.

Authors:  Athanasios S Stasinakis; Smaragdi Mermigka; Vasilios G Samaras; Eleni Farmaki; Nikolaos S Thomaidis
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Isolation and characterization of Sphingomonas sp. Y2 capable of high-efficiency degradation of nonylphenol polyethoxylates in wastewater.

Authors:  Naling Bai; Sheng Wang; Rexiding Abuduaini; Xufen Zhu; Yuhua Zhao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Biofiltration vs conventional activated sludge plants: what about priority and emerging pollutants removal?

Authors:  R Mailler; J Gasperi; V Rocher; S Gilbert-Pawlik; D Geara-Matta; R Moilleron; G Chebbo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Effect of the test media and toxicity of LAS on the growth of Isochrysis galbana.

Authors:  M C Garrido-Perez; J A Perales-VargasMachuca; E Nebot-Sanz; D Sales-Márquez
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Occurrence of multi-class surfactants in urban wastewater: contribution of a healthcare facility to the pollution transported into the sewerage system.

Authors:  Alexandre Bergé; Laure Wiest; Robert Baudot; Barbara Giroud; Emmanuelle Vulliet
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Treatment of 2,4-D, mecoprop, and dicamba using membrane bioreactor technology.

Authors:  Avik J Ghoshdastidar; Anthony Z Tong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Environmental monitoring of alcohol sulfates and alcohol ethoxysulfates in marine sediments.

Authors:  Carolina Fernández-Ramos; Oscar Ballesteros; Alberto Zafra-Gómez; Francisco Javier Camino-Sánchez; Rosario Blanc; Alberto Navalón; José Luís Vílchez
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.