Literature DB >> 17123159

The effect of lineup member similarity on recognition accuracy in simultaneous and sequential lineups.

Heather D Flowe1, Ebbe B Ebbesen.   

Abstract

Two experiments investigated whether remembering is affected by the similarity of the study face relative to the alternatives in a lineup. In simultaneous and sequential lineups, choice rates and false alarms were larger in low compared to high similarity lineups, indicating criterion placement was affected by lineup similarity structure (Experiment 1). In Experiment 2, foil choices and similarity ranking data for target present lineups were compared to responses made when the target was removed from the lineup (only the 5 foils were presented). The results indicated that although foils were selected more often in target-removed lineups in the simultaneous compared to the sequential condition, responses shifted from the target to one of the foils at equal rates across lineup procedures.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17123159     DOI: 10.1007/s10979-006-9045-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Law Hum Behav        ISSN: 0147-7307


  4 in total

Review 1.  Eyewitness identification evidence and innocence risk.

Authors:  Steven E Clark; Ryan D Godfrey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

2.  Lineup fairness: propitious heterogeneity and the diagnostic feature-detection hypothesis.

Authors:  Curt A Carlson; Alyssa R Jones; Jane E Whittington; Robert F Lockamyeir; Maria A Carlson; Alex R Wooten
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2019-06-13

3.  Experimental validation of a multinomial processing tree model for analyzing eyewitness identification decisions.

Authors:  Kristina Winter; Nicola M Menne; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Eyewitness Identification: Live, Photo, and Video Lineups.

Authors:  Ryan J Fitzgerald; Heather L Price; Tim Valentine
Journal:  Psychol Public Policy Law       Date:  2018-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.