Literature DB >> 17123152

Differentially expressed genes between primary cancer and paired lymph node metastases predict clinical outcome of node-positive breast cancer patients.

Yumei Feng1, Baocun Sun, Xiaoqing Li, Liang Zhang, Yun Niu, Chunhua Xiao, Liansheng Ning, Zhiyi Fang, Yuli Wang, Lina Zhang, Jing Cheng, Wei Zhang, Xishan Hao.   

Abstract

The axillary lymph node status remains the most valuable prognostic factor for breast cancer patients. However, approximately 20-30% of node-positive patients remain free of distant metastases within 15-30 years. It is important to develop molecular markers that are able to predict for the risk of distant metastasis and to develop patient-tailored therapy strategies. We hypothesize that the lymph node metastases may represent the most metastatic fraction of the primary cancers. Therefore, we sought to identify the differentially expressed genes by microarray between the primary tumors and their paired lymph node metastases samples collected from 26 patients. A set of 79 differentially expressed genes between primary cancers and metastasis samples was identified to correctly separate most of primary cancers from lymph node metastases. And decreased expression of matrix metalloproteinase 2, fibronectin, osteoblast specific factor 2, collagen type XI alpha 1 in lymph node metastases were further confirmed by real-time RT-PCR performed on 30 specimen pairs. This set of genes also classified 35 primary cancers into two groups with different prognosis: "high risk group" and "low risk group." Patients in "high risk group" had a 4.65-fold hazard ratio (95% CI 1.02-21.13, P = 0.047) to develop a distant metastasis within 43 months comparing with the "low risk group." This suggested that the gene signature consisting of 79 differentially expressed genes between primary cancers and lymph node metastases could also predict clinical outcome of node-positive patients, and that the molecular classification based on the gene signature could guide patient-tailored therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17123152     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-006-9385-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  59 in total

1.  Heterogeneity of drug target expression among metastatic lesions: lessons from a breast cancer autopsy program.

Authors:  Patricia S Steeg
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  The application of gene co-expression network reconstruction based on CNVs and gene expression microarray data in breast cancer.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Huizi Duanmu; Zhiqiang Chang; Shanzhen Zhang; Zhenqi Li; Zihui Li; Yufeng Liu; Kening Li; Fujun Qiu; Xia Li
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  A transcriptome-proteome integrated network identifies endoplasmic reticulum thiol oxidoreductase (ERp57) as a hub that mediates bone metastasis.

Authors:  Naiara Santana-Codina; Rafael Carretero; Rebeca Sanz-Pamplona; Teresa Cabrera; Emre Guney; Baldo Oliva; Philippe Clezardin; Omar E Olarte; Pablo Loza-Alvarez; Andrés Méndez-Lucas; Jose Carlos Perales; Angels Sierra
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 4.  COL11A1/(pro)collagen 11A1 expression is a remarkable biomarker of human invasive carcinoma-associated stromal cells and carcinoma progression.

Authors:  Fernando Vázquez-Villa; Marcos García-Ocaña; José A Galván; Jorge García-Martínez; Carmen García-Pravia; Primitiva Menéndez-Rodríguez; Carmen González-del Rey; Luis Barneo-Serra; Juan R de Los Toyos
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-03-12

Review 5.  Lymphatic metastasis in breast cancer: importance and new insights into cellular and molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  Suzanne Eccles; Lenaic Paon; Jonathan Sleeman
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 5.150

6.  Collagen alpha1(XI) in normal and malignant breast tissue.

Authors:  Karen C Halsted; Kara B Bowen; Laura Bond; Sarah E Luman; Cheryl L Jorcyk; William E Fyffe; Joseph D Kronz; Julia T Oxford
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Frequent genetic differences between matched primary and metastatic breast cancer provide an approach to identification of biomarkers for disease progression.

Authors:  Andrzej B Popławski; Michał Jankowski; Stephen W Erickson; Teresita Díaz de Ståhl; E Christopher Partridge; Chiquito Crasto; Jingyu Guo; John Gibson; Uwe Menzel; Carl Eg Bruder; Aneta Kaczmarczyk; Magdalena Benetkiewicz; Robin Andersson; Johanna Sandgren; Barbara Zegarska; Dariusz Bała; Ewa Srutek; David B Allison; Arkadiusz Piotrowski; Wojciech Zegarski; Jan P Dumanski
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Inhibition of metastatic outgrowth from single dormant tumor cells by targeting the cytoskeleton.

Authors:  Dalit Barkan; Hynda Kleinman; Justin L Simmons; Holly Asmussen; Anil K Kamaraju; Mark J Hoenorhoff; Zi-yao Liu; Sylvain V Costes; Edward H Cho; Stephen Lockett; Chand Khanna; Ann F Chambers; Jeffrey E Green
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Multi-platform whole-genome microarray analyses refine the epigenetic signature of breast cancer metastasis with gene expression and copy number.

Authors:  Joseph Andrews; Wendy Kennette; Jenna Pilon; Alexandra Hodgson; Alan B Tuck; Ann F Chambers; David I Rodenhiser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Prediction of breast cancer metastasis by genomic profiling: where do we stand?

Authors:  Ulrich Pfeffer; Francesco Romeo; Douglas M Noonan; Adriana Albini
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 5.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.