Literature DB >> 17122504

Comparison of microsatellite instability, CpG island methylation phenotype, BRAF and KRAS status in serrated polyps and traditional adenomas indicates separate pathways to distinct colorectal carcinoma end points.

Michael J O'Brien1, Shi Yang, Charline Mack, Huihong Xu, Christopher S Huang, Elizabeth Mulcahy, Mark Amorosino, Francis A Farraye.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare BRAF and KRAS, CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and microsatellite instability (MSI) status in each of the histologic categories, including end-point carcinomas with residual adenoma, of the serrated polyp neoplasia pathway and the traditional (nonserrated) adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted from the selected samples and assayed for BRAF, KRAS2 codon12, 13, CIMP using markers hMLH1, MGMT, MINT1, MINT2, p16, and MSI using an assay for BAT25 and BAT26. A BRAF mutation was present in 82% of serrated carcinomas (SCas), 62% of serrated adenomas (SAs), 83% of serrated polyps with abnormal proliferation (SPAPs-syn. sessile serrated adenoma [SSA]), 76% of microvesicular serrated polyps (MVSPs), and was not found in any of the histologic categories of the traditional adenoma-carcinoma sequence. KRAS2 mutations were found in 43% of the goblet cell serrated polyp (GCSP) category, 13% of MVSPs, 7% of SPAPs, and 24% of SAs; in 26% of large traditional adenoma (lTAs) compared with small traditional adenomas (sTAs) (0/30; P<0.005) and in 37.3% of traditional carcinomas (TCa). CIMP-H (>1 marker positive) was significantly more frequent in SPAP, SA, and SCa compared with MVSP (P<0.05); CIMP-H was present in 10% of sTAs but was found more frequently in lTA (44.4%; OR 7.2; P=0.007) and TCa (38.9%; OR 5.8; P=0.007). Higher CIMP levels (4 or more markers positive) were significantly more frequent in advanced categories of the serrated pathway (SAs [31%] and SCas [30%]) compared with lTAs [0%] and TCAs [3.4%] (OR 12.2; P=0.02). MSI-H was identified only in the adenocarcinoma component of SCas (9/11) or in the contiguous SAs (3/7). The findings indicate that a BRAF mutation is a specific marker for a serrated polyp pathway that has its origin in a hyperplastic polyp (MVSP) and a potential end point as MSI carcinoma. CIMP-High (CIMP-H) develops early in this sequence and MSI-H develops late. The data provided a less complete picture of a second serrated pathway, identified by a KRAS2 mutation in SAs, but showed that the progressive stages of both iterations of the serrated neoplasia pathway are separate and distinct from those of the traditional adenoma-carcinoma sequence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17122504     DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000213313.36306.85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  160 in total

1.  Annexin A10 is a marker for the serrated pathway of colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Sara A Sajanti; Juha P Väyrynen; Päivi Sirniö; Kai Klintrup; Jyrki Mäkelä; Anne Tuomisto; Markus J Mäkinen
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  ANALYSIS OF MINNESOTA COLON AND RECTUM CANCER POINT PATTERNS WITH SPATIAL AND NONSPATIAL COVARIATE INFORMATION.

Authors:  Shengde Liang; Bradley P Carlin; Alan E Gelfand
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 2.083

3.  Characteristics of advanced- and non advanced sporadic polypoid colorectal adenomas: correlation to KRAS mutations.

Authors:  Enkh-Amar Yadamsuren; Szilvia Nagy; Laszlo Pajor; Agnes Lacza; Barna Bogner
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Prospective evaluation of a simplified narrowband imaging scoring system for a differential diagnosis of colorectal lesions.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Aihara; Nitin Kumar; Marvin Ryou; Robert Burakoff; Marwan Abou Gergi; Michele B Ryan; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Associations between molecular characteristics of colorectal serrated polyps and subsequent advanced colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Xinwei Hua; Polly A Newcomb; Jessica Chubak; Rachel C Malen; Rebecca Ziebell; Aruna Kamineni; Lee-Ching Zhu; Melissa P Upton; Michelle A Wurscher; Sushma S Thomas; Hana Newman; Sheetal Hardikar; Andrea N Burnett-Hartman
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 6.  Serrated Polyps of Colon and Rectum: a Clinicopathologic Review.

Authors:  Bita Geramizadeh; Scott Robertson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2017-12

Review 7.  Molecular pathological epidemiology of colorectal neoplasia: an emerging transdisciplinary and interdisciplinary field.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Andrew T Chan; Charles S Fuchs; Edward Giovannucci
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Over-expression of cathepsin E and trefoil factor 1 in sessile serrated adenomas of the colorectum identified by gene expression analysis.

Authors:  Maria Caruso; James Moore; Gregory J Goodall; Michelle Thomas; Stuart Phillis; Anna Tyskin; Glenice Cheetham; Nancy Lerda; Hiroyuki Takahashi; Andrew Ruszkiewicz
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Management of serrated adenomas and hyperplastic polyps.

Authors:  Valerie P Bauer; Harry T Papaconstantinou
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-11

10.  Heterogeneity of colorectal adenomas, the serrated adenoma, and implications for screening and surveillance.

Authors:  Hugh-James Freeman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.