| Literature DB >> 17122182 |
Nils B Jostmann1, Sander L Koole.
Abstract
The present research examined how action- versus state-oriented individuals (Kuhl & Beckmann, 1994) utilize their working memory capacity under varying situational demands. Participants visualized either a demanding or an accepting person, after which their working memory capacity was assessed. Among action-oriented participants, visualizing a demanding person led to greater operation spans (Study 1) and superior memory for intention-related information (Study 2) than visualizing an accepting person. State-oriented participants displayed the opposite pattern, such that visualizing an accepting person led to greater operation spans (Study 1) and superior memory for intentions (Study 2) than visualizing a demanding person. These findings indicate that action versus state orientation moderates the impact of situational demands on working memory capacity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2006 PMID: 17122182 DOI: 10.1177/0146167206292595
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pers Soc Psychol Bull ISSN: 0146-1672