Literature DB >> 17121980

Technical note: A model to estimate individual feed intake of swine in group feeding.

M D Lindemann1, B G Kim.   

Abstract

In most animal growth experiments, groups of animals are housed within a pen. Occasionally, an individual animal shows a very different growth rate than its pen mates or dies during the experiment. When this happens, if pen feed intake (PFI) cannot be reestimated for the calculation of ADFI and feed efficiency, an observation will be lost from the data set. Therefore, we propose a model to estimate individual feed intake (IFI) of pigs in group feeding, with subsequent validation of the model using group feeding simulation studies. In the proposed model, the feed intake (FI) of each affected pen is partitioned into FI for maintenance (FI(m)) and FI for growth (FI(g)) for each animal within that pen. First, individual pig FI(m) for the period is calculated using the 1998 National Research Council estimation of ME for maintenance. Then, FI(m) for all pigs in the pen is summed. The difference between the summed FI(m) and the total PFI is that which supported growth in the pen. Next, FI(g) is calculated by apportioning the remaining feed equally to each unit of gain within the pen. Finally, the estimated IFI for the pig being removed from the pen is the sum of FI(m) and FI(g) for that pig; this FI estimate is subtracted from the original PFI to leave the new PFI for the remaining pigs. The validity of the estimated IFI is dependent on the accuracy of the maintenance energy equation and the energy analysis of the feedstuffs. In simulation studies, we compared the accuracy of the proposed method with 2 other methods. In simulation study 1, the proposed model showed better accuracy than at least one of the other methods during all tested periods (P < 0.001). In simulation study 2, the greater accuracy of the proposed method compared with 2 other methods was demonstrated again. Because calculation of IFI is relatively cumbersome, we developed a feed intake correction spreadsheet (FICS), an Excel spreadsheet containing macros for FI correction. All of the calculation procedures in the proposed model are included within the feed intake correction spreadsheet. The Excel file and instructions are being made available via a Web site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17121980     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2006-412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  13 in total

1.  Antibiotic inclusion in the diet did not alter the standardized ileal digestible tryptophan to lysine ratio for growing pigs.

Authors:  D Y Yu; M D Lindemann; A D Quant; Y D Jang; R L Payne; B J Kerr
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effects of dietary spray-dried plasma protein on nutrient digestibility and growth performance in nursery pigs.

Authors:  Hansol Kim; Seung Hyung Lee; Beob Gyun Kim
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Increased microbial phytase increased phytate destruction, plasma inositol, and feed efficiency of weanling pigs, but reduced dietary calcium and phosphorus did not affect gastric pH or fecal score and reduced growth performance and bone ash.

Authors:  L Vanessa Lagos; Mike R Bedford; Hans H Stein
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  High inclusion rates of hybrid rye instead of corn in diets for growing-finishing pigs do not influence the overall growth performance and most carcass traits are not influenced by hybrid rye.

Authors:  Molly L McGhee; Bailey N Harsh; Hans H Stein
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Formulating diets based on digestible calcium instead of total calcium does not affect growth performance or carcass characteristics, but microbial phytase ameliorates bone resorption caused by low calcium in diets fed to pigs from 11 to 130 kg.

Authors:  L Vanessa Lagos; Su A Lee; Mike R Bedford; Hans H Stein
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Different Coefficients and Exponents for Metabolic Body Weight in a Model to Estimate Individual Feed Intake for Growing-finishing Pigs.

Authors:  S A Lee; C Kong; O Adeola; B G Kim
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 2.509

7.  Growth performance and carcass quality are not different between pigs fed diets containing cold-fermented low-oil DDGS and pigs fed conventional DDGS, but pelleting improves gain to feed ratio regardless of source of DDGS.

Authors:  Diego A Rodriguez; Su A Lee; Hans H Stein
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.338

8.  Evaluation of trace mineral source and preharvest deletion of trace minerals from finishing diets on tissue mineral status in pigs.

Authors:  Y L Ma; M D Lindemann; S F Webb; G Rentfrow
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 2.509

9.  Effects of different space allowances on growth performance, blood profile and pork quality in a grow-to-finish production system.

Authors:  J C Jang; X H Jin; J S Hong; Y Y Kim
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  Phosphorus utilization response of pigs and broiler chickens to diets supplemented with antimicrobials and phytase.

Authors:  Katherine McCormick; Carrie L Walk; Craig L Wyatt; Olayiwola Adeola
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2016-11-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.