PURPOSE: Because both emphysema and lung cancer can arise from biological damage caused by cigarette smoking, we investigated if the development of emphysema is associated with the clinical features of smoker's lung cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The subjects were a consecutive series of 100 smokers who underwent lobectomy with hilar and mediastinal dissection for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. We studied the relationship between the presence or absence of emphysema at the onset of the lung cancer and clinicopathologic features. Emphysema was diagnosed by measuring the low-attenuation area using computed tomography densitometry. RESULTS: There were no differences in clinicopathologic variables, including the degree of smoking exposure between the patients with (n=58) and those without (n=42) emphysema, although male gender and airflow limitation were predominant in the patients with emphysema. The presence of emphysema, but neither male gender nor airflow limitation, adversely affected both overall and disease-specific survival. According to Cox regression analysis, emphysema was an independent prognosticator among age, gender, degree of smoking exposure, tumor size, nodal status, histologic subtype, histologic grade, and microvessel invasion. These results were stabilized by a bootstrap sampling model. CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography-diagnosed emphysema, but not airway obstruction, is associated with poor prognosis in smokers with early-stage lung cancer. Thus, routine computed tomography densitometry in smokers with lung cancer should be mandatory.
PURPOSE: Because both emphysema and lung cancer can arise from biological damage caused by cigarette smoking, we investigated if the development of emphysema is associated with the clinical features of smoker's lung cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The subjects were a consecutive series of 100 smokers who underwent lobectomy with hilar and mediastinal dissection for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. We studied the relationship between the presence or absence of emphysema at the onset of the lung cancer and clinicopathologic features. Emphysema was diagnosed by measuring the low-attenuation area using computed tomography densitometry. RESULTS: There were no differences in clinicopathologic variables, including the degree of smoking exposure between the patients with (n=58) and those without (n=42) emphysema, although male gender and airflow limitation were predominant in the patients with emphysema. The presence of emphysema, but neither male gender nor airflow limitation, adversely affected both overall and disease-specific survival. According to Cox regression analysis, emphysema was an independent prognosticator among age, gender, degree of smoking exposure, tumor size, nodal status, histologic subtype, histologic grade, and microvessel invasion. These results were stabilized by a bootstrap sampling model. CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography-diagnosed emphysema, but not airway obstruction, is associated with poor prognosis in smokers with early-stage lung cancer. Thus, routine computed tomography densitometry in smokers with lung cancer should be mandatory.
Authors: Javier J Zulueta; Juan P Wisnivesky; Claudia I Henschke; Rowena Yip; Ali O Farooqi; Dorothy I McCauley; Mildred Chen; Daniel M Libby; James P Smith; Mark W Pasmantier; David F Yankelevitz Journal: Chest Date: 2011-10-20 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Nader Mina; Ayman O Soubani; Michele L Cote; Tariq Suwan; Angie S Wenzlaff; Sunil Jhajhria; Husam Samarah; Ann G Schwartz Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2011-11-29 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Antonello Punturieri; Eva Szabo; Thomas L Croxton; Steven D Shapiro; Steven M Dubinett Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2009-04-07 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Ann G Schwartz; Christine M Lusk; Angela S Wenzlaff; Donovan Watza; Stephanie Pandolfi; Laura Mantha; Michele L Cote; Ayman O Soubani; Garrett Walworth; Antoinette Wozniak; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Amy A Ardisana; Michael J Flynn; Thomas Song; David L Spizarny; Paul A Kvale; Robert A Chapman; Shirish M Gadgeel Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-07-06 Impact factor: 4.254