Literature DB >> 17121867

Prospective comparison of three predictive rules for assessing severity of community-acquired pneumonia in Hong Kong.

Shin Yan Man1, Nelson Lee, Margaret Ip, Gregory E Antonio, Shirley S L Chau, Paulina Mak, Colin A Graham, Mingdong Zhang, Grace Lui, Paul K S Chan, Anil T Ahuja, David S Hui, Joseph J Y Sung, Timothy H Rainer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a leading infectious cause of death throughout the world, including Hong Kong. AIM: To compare the ability of three validated prediction rules for CAP to predict mortality in Hong Kong: the 20 variable Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), the 6-point CURB65 scale adopted by the British Thoracic Society and the simpler CRB65.
METHODS: A prospective observational study of 1016 consecutive inpatients with CAP (583 men, mean (SD) age 72 (17) years) was performed in a university hospital in the New Territories of Hong Kong in 2004. The patients were classified into three risk groups (low, intermediate and high) according to each rule. The ability of the three rules to predict 30 day mortality was compared.
RESULTS: The overall mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates were 8.6% and 4.0%, respectively. PSI, CURB65 and CRB65 performed similarly, and the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were 0.736 (95% CI 0.687 to 0.736), 0.733 (95% CI 0.679 to 0.787) and 0.694 (95% CI 0.634 to 0.753), respectively. All three rules had high negative predictive values but relatively low positive predictive values at all cut-off points. Larger proportions of patients were identified as low risk by PSI (47.2%) and CURB65 (43.3%) than by CRB65 (12.6%).
CONCLUSION: All three predictive rules have a similar performance in predicting the severity of CAP, but CURB65 is more suitable than the other two for use in the emergency department because of its simplicity of application and ability to identify low-risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17121867      PMCID: PMC2092476          DOI: 10.1136/thx.2006.069740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  21 in total

1.  BTS Guidelines for the Management of Community Acquired Pneumonia in Adults.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study.

Authors:  W S Lim; M M van der Eerden; R Laing; W G Boersma; N Karalus; G I Town; S A Lewis; J T Macfarlane
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  2004 update of BTS pneumonia guidelines: what's new?

Authors:  J T Macfarlane; D Boldy
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 4.  Pneumonia in the very old.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Janssens; Karl-Heinz Krause
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 25.071

5.  A prospective comparison of nursing home acquired pneumonia with community acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  W S Lim; J T Macfarlane
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 16.671

6.  A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  M J Fine; T E Auble; D M Yealy; B H Hanusa; L A Weissfeld; D E Singer; C M Coley; T J Marrie; W N Kapoor
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-01-23       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Community acquired pneumonia: aetiology and usefulness of severity criteria on admission.

Authors:  A M Neill; I R Martin; R Weir; R Anderson; A Chereshsky; M J Epton; R Jackson; M Schousboe; C Frampton; S Hutton; S T Chambers; G I Town
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  Validation of predictive rules and indices of severity for community acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  S Ewig; A de Roux; T Bauer; E García; J Mensa; M Niederman; A Torres
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.139

9.  Treatment costs of community-acquired pneumonia in an employed population.

Authors:  Gene L Colice; Melissa A Morley; Carl Asche; Howard G Birnbaum
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Evaluation of WHO criteria for identifying patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome out of hospital: prospective observational study.

Authors:  Timothy H Rainer; Peter A Cameron; DeVilliers Smit; Kim L Ong; Alex Ng Wing Hung; David Chan Po Nin; Anil T Ahuja; Louis Chan Yik Si; Joseph J Y Sung
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-06-21
View more
  47 in total

1.  Severity assessment for lower respiratory tract infections: potential use and validity of the CRB-65 in primary care.

Authors:  Nick A Francis; Jochen W Cals; Christopher C Butler; Kerenza Hood; Theo Verheij; Paul Little; Herman Goossens; Samuel Coenen
Journal:  Prim Care Respir J       Date:  2012-03

2.  Lower respiratory tract infection in the community: prognosis predictably difficult to predict.

Authors:  Paul A Marsden; Mark Woodhead
Journal:  Prim Care Respir J       Date:  2012-03

3.  CURB-65 pneumonia severity assessment adapted for electronic decision support.

Authors:  Barbara E Jones; Jason Jones; Thomas Bewick; Wei Shen Lim; Dominik Aronsky; Samuel M Brown; Wim G Boersma; Menno M van der Eerden; Nathan C Dean
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 4.  Validity of British Thoracic Society guidance (the CRB-65 rule) for predicting the severity of pneumonia in general practice: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maggie McNally; James Curtain; Kirsty K O'Brien; Borislav D Dimitrov; Tom Fahey
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections--full version.

Authors:  M Woodhead; F Blasi; S Ewig; J Garau; G Huchon; M Ieven; A Ortqvist; T Schaberg; A Torres; G van der Heijden; R Read; T J M Verheij
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 8.067

6.  Severity assessment in community-acquired pneumonia: moving on.

Authors:  Wei Shen Lim
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Analysis of the severity and prognosis assessment of aged patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Kun Xiao; Long-Xiang Su; Bing-Chao Han; Peng Yan; Na Yuan; Jie Deng; Jia Li; Li-Xin Xie
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Recent changes in the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults.

Authors:  Hannah J Durrington; Charlotte Summers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-06-21

9.  Modern Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Is It Cost-Effective and are Outcomes Acceptable?

Authors:  Dominik Mertz; Jennie Johnstone
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 10.  Defining and predicting severe community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Samuel M Brown; Nathan C Dean
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.