Literature DB >> 17121737

Deposition of differently sized airborne microspheres in the respiratory tract of chickens.

E A Corbanie1, M G R Matthijs, J H H van Eck, J P Remon, W J M Landman, C Vervaet.   

Abstract

As a part of the development of an efficient dry powder aerosol vaccine for poultry, the objective of this study was to accurately determine the deposition pattern of nebulized microspheres in the airways of unanaesthetized chickens of different ages (1 day, 2 weeks and 4 weeks old). In the first part of the study, the aerosol administration method was characterized: the influence of different nebulizers and nebulizing protocols on the relative humidity in the exposure chamber, the particle size distributions, the microsphere output and single microsphere percentage were determined. In the second part, birds were exposed to nebulized fluorescently labelled polystyrene microspheres (1 to 20 microm). Respiratory and gastro-intestinal tract tissue samples were collected and the number of fluorescent microspheres per sample was determined. In 2-week-old and 4-week-old chickens, microspheres of 5 and 10 microm, respectively, were too large for deposition in the lungs and air sacs as less than 5% of these microspheres penetrated into the lower airways. The larger size of microspheres reaching the lower airways of 4-week-old birds was explained by increasing airway dimensions with age. For 1-day-old chickens, deposition in the lungs decreased from 17 to 3% with increasing particle size (1 to 20 microm), but increased in the air sacs from 6 to 20%. Consequently, the total deposition percentage in the lower airways was independent of microsphere size and even 20 microm particles were able to penetrate into the lower airways, which was attributed to mouth breathing of the 1-day-old chickens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17121737     DOI: 10.1080/03079450601028845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Pathol        ISSN: 0307-9457            Impact factor:   3.378


  13 in total

Review 1.  Veterinary vaccine nanotechnology: pulmonary and nasal delivery in livestock animals.

Authors:  Daniella Calderon-Nieva; Kalhari Bandara Goonewardene; Susantha Gomis; Marianna Foldvari
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.617

2.  Study of nebulization delivery of aerosolized fluorescent microspheres to the avian respiratory tract.

Authors:  Lisa A Tell; Kimberly Stephens; Stephen V Teague; Kent E Pinkerton; Otto G Raabe
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.577

3.  Highly pathogenic or low pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H7N1 infection in chicken lungs: small differences in general acute responses.

Authors:  Johanna M J Rebel; Ben Peeters; Helmi Fijten; Jacob Post; Jan Cornelissen; Lonneke Vervelde
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.683

4.  Aspergillus fumigatus in Poultry.

Authors:  Pascal Arné; Simon Thierry; Dongying Wang; Manjula Deville; Guillaume Le Loc'h; Anaïs Desoutter; Françoise Féménia; Adélaïde Nieguitsila; Weiyi Huang; René Chermette; Jacques Guillot
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-14

Review 5.  Air Quality in Alternative Housing Systems May Have an Impact on Laying Hen Welfare. Part I-Dust.

Authors:  Bruce David; Randi Oppermann Moe; Virginie Michel; Vonne Lund; Cecilie Mejdell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Preparation of mucosal nanoparticles and polymer-based inactivated vaccine for Newcastle disease and H9N2 AI viruses.

Authors:  Heba M El Naggar; Mohamed Sayed Madkour; Hussein Ali Hussein
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2017-02-14

Review 7.  The Well-Developed Mucosal Immune Systems of Birds and Mammals Allow for Similar Approaches of Mucosal Vaccination in Both Types of Animals.

Authors:  Tomonori Nochi; Christine A Jansen; Masaaki Toyomizu; Willem van Eden
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2018-07-12

8.  Passive inhalation of dry powder influenza vaccine formulations completely protects chickens against H5N1 lethal viral challenge.

Authors:  Jasmine Tomar; Carin Biel; Cornelis A M de Haan; Peter J M Rottier; Nikolai Petrovsky; Henderik W Frijlink; Anke Huckriede; Wouter L J Hinrichs; Ben Peeters
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 5.571

9.  Efficacy of intranasal and spray delivery of adjuvanted live vaccine against infectious bronchitis virus in experimentally infected poultry.

Authors:  Sebastien Deville; Juliette Ben Arous; François Bertrand; Vladimir Borisov; Laurent Dupuis
Journal:  Procedia Vaccinol       Date:  2012-05-02

10.  Airborne Microorganisms From Livestock Production Systems and Their Relation to Dust.

Authors:  Yang Zhao; AndrÉ J A Aarnink; Mart C M De Jong; Peter W G Groot Koerkamp
Journal:  Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 12.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.