Literature DB >> 17121555

Prospective, randomized comparison of laryngeal tube and laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients.

H V Genzwuerker1, A Fritz, J Hinkelbein, T Finteis, A Schlaefer, M Schaeffer, E Thil, H J Rapp.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While reports of the use of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)-Classic in great patient numbers are available, data on the use of the laryngeal tube (LT) in this age group is limited. The two devices are compared in a prospective randomized trial to evaluate success rates and quality of airway seal.
METHODS: Sixty children, aged 2-8 years, scheduled for elective surgical interventions were randomized to be ventilated with LMA or LT. Standardized anesthesia was induced with fentanyl and propofol. Number of insertion attempts, time until first tidal volume and intraoperative tidal volumes, and peak pressures were recorded. Airway leak pressure was measured with cuff pressure adjusted to 60 cmH(2)O.
RESULTS: Demographic data were comparable, average age in the LMA/LT group was 5.2 +/- 1.9/5.3 +/- 1.9 years. Insertion was successful in 29 of 30 patients in the LMA group (second attempt 8) and in all patients in the LT group (second attempt 3). Time until first tidal volume for LMA/LT was 23.1 +/- 7.3/19.2 +/- 8.6 s (P < 0.05). Peak airway pressures for LMA and LT were 15.3 +/- 3.4 and 17.1 +/- 4.0 cmH(2)O (P < 0.05) with tidal volumes of 10.2 +/- 2.2 and 10.2 +/- 1.9 ml.kg(-1), airway leak pressure was 19.2 +/- 8.6 cmH(2)O for LMA and 26.3 +/- 7.3 cmH(2)O for LT (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Insertion success rate is high with both LMA and LT in the age group studied. The airway leak pressure, serving as an estimate to judge quality of airway seal, is higher with the LT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17121555     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.01984.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Interdisciplinary consensus statement on alternative airway management with supraglottic airway devices in pediatric emergency medicine: Laryngeal mask is state of the art].

Authors:  J Keil; P Jung; A Schiele; B Urban; A Parsch; B Matsche; C Eich; K Becke; B Landsleitner; S G Russo; M Bernhard; T Nicolai; F Hoffmann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Randomized evaluation of the size 2 laryngeal tube and classical laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions in children under positive pressure ventilation.

Authors:  Andreas Biedler; Marc Wrobel; Sven Schneider; Stefan Soltész; Stephan Ziegeler; Ulrich Grundmann
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Randomized crossover study assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure and fiber optic positioning : Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ versus Laryngeal Tube LTS II™ size 2 in non-paralyzed anesthetized children.

Authors:  L Gasteiger; S Ofner; B Stögermüller; B Ziegler; J Brimacombe; C Keller
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Comparing the Laryngeal Mask Airway, Cobra Perilaryngeal Airway and Face Mask in Children Airway Management.

Authors:  Beyza Tekin; Zehra Hatipoğlu; Mediha Türktan; Dilek Özcengiz
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2016-04-01

5.  Laryngeal mask airway vs the endotracheal tube in paediatric airway management: A meta-analysis of prospective randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Abhiruchi Patki
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2011-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.