Literature DB >> 17120829

In-situ surfactant/surfactant-nutrient mix-enhanced bioremediation of NAPL (fuel)-contaminated sandy soil aquifers.

Uri Zoller1, Alla Reznik.   

Abstract

SCOPE AND
BACKGROUND: Contamination of soils, aquifers and groundwater by nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) pollutants constitutes a major environmental issue of concern, worldwide. The residual (biodegradation-resistant) hydrophobic fuel hydrocarbons entrapped in the soil porous matrix, possess a particular bioremediation challenge due to their becoming virtually immobile, nor desorbable, or water dispersible. Consequently, they are not available as substrates to the micro-organism-based biodegradation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our research involves the development of economically feasible, surfactant/surfactant-nutrient mix (SSNM)-enhanced bioremediation methodologies for sustainable, in situ bioremediation of fuel-contaminated aquifers. This requires, methodologically, (a) the optimization, via in vitro 'flow' (columns) lab experiments and screening processes, of an effective mixture for the intended SSNM-enhanced bioremediation; and (b) the study of the combined effect of the optimized SSNM on the solubilization/mobilization and biodegradation of NAPL (fuel) in in vitro site/aquifer-simulated bioremediation. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The essence of our findings: (1) kerosene's maximum enhanced mobilization - f = 3.6, compared with that of deionized water, was achieved with an SSNM having the composition of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LABS): coco-amphodiacetate (containing N): surfactant-nutrient X (containing both N and P) = 0.15: 0.15: 0.05 g/L, respectively; (2) 62-64% of the initial amount of kerosene in the initially saturated soil matrix, 'packed' in a column, has been eluted from it during approximately 30 days, compared with 68% of kerosene biodegradation in 'vessel' settings, in 21 days.
CONCLUSIONS: (1) The indigenous microorganisms present in th vadose zones of fuel-contaminated sandy soil aquifers are potentially capable of unassisted removal of approximately 80% of the initially contained fuel (kerosene), during a period of about 42 days; (2) the major effects of the SSNM addition are (a) enhanced mobilization of the bulky NAPL; and (b) enhanced desorbtion/ solubilization/dispersion of the entrapped NAPL which, in turn, facilitate their enhanced biodegradation. RECOMMENDATIONS AND PERSPECTIVE: Our findings suggest that pre-optimized, biodegradable SSNM is essential for surfactants-based bioremediation of NAPL-contaminated aquifers, in order to make this in-situ methodology both technologically and economically feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17120829     DOI: 10.1065/espr2006.03.295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  9 in total

1.  What is sustainable remediation?

Authors:  S Lesage; U Zoller
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.269

2.  Simultaneous uptake of anionic surfactants and micellar-solubilized contaminants using anion-exchange resins.

Authors:  Hefa Cheng; D A Sabatini
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 11.236

3.  Conductivity reduction due to emulsification during surfactant enhanced-aquifer remediation. 1. Emulsion transport.

Authors:  Vivek Jain; Avery H Demond
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Remediating chlorinated solvent source zones.

Authors:  Hans F Stroo; Marvin Unger; C Herb Ward; Michael C Kavanaugh; Catherine Vogel; Andrea Leeson; Jeffrey Marqusee; Bradley P Smith
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 5.  Contaminant bioavailability in soil and sediment.

Authors:  Laura J Ehlers; Richard G Luthy
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Feasibility of in situ NAPL-contaminated aquifer bioremediation by biodegradable nutrient-surfactant mix.

Authors:  U Zoller; H Rubin
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.269

7.  Evaluation of the impact of fuel hydrocarbons and oxygenates on groundwater resources.

Authors:  Tom Shih; Yue Rong; Thomas Harmon; Mel Suffet
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Evaluation of an elevated non-ionic surfactant critical micelle concentration in a soil/aqueous system.

Authors:  Zhongming Zheng; Jeffrey Philip Obbard
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Dissolution of entrapped DNAPLs in variable aperture fractures: experimental data and empirical model.

Authors:  Sarah E Dickson; Neil R Thomson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

  9 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Bioremediation treatment of hydrocarbon-contaminated Arctic soils: influencing parameters.

Authors:  Masoud Naseri; Abbas Barabadi; Javad Barabady
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Remediation of trapped DNAPL enhanced by SDS surfactant and silica nanoparticles in heterogeneous porous media: experimental data and empirical models.

Authors:  Mehdi Ramezanzadeh; Saeid Khasi; Mobeen Fatemi; Mohammad Hossein Ghazanfari
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 4.223

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.