Literature DB >> 17120488

A comparison of data sources for the surveillance of seasonal and pandemic influenza in Victoria.

Hazel J Clothier1, Luke Atkin, Joy Turner, Vijaya Sundararajan, Heath A Kelly.   

Abstract

Understanding the characteristics of available influenza or influenza-like illness (ILI) surveillance systems is important for seasonal influenza surveillance and pandemic preparedness. We compared five influenza or ILI data sources in Victoria: notifications of laboratory-confirmed influenza to the Victorian Department of Human Services; hospital emergency presentations and hospital admissions; sentinel general practitioner surveillance; and medical locum service surveillance. Seasonal trends for influenza and ILI activity were similar for all data sources. Community ILI surveillance, operating as sentinel GP, locum service or hospital emergency department surveillance, in conjunction with notification of laboratory-confirmed influenza, would provide adequate inter-pandemic surveillance for influenza in Victoria and, by extension, in any Australian jurisdiction. Other surveillance systems would be needed for early pandemic case or cluster detection, while pandemic monitoring would be better achieved by a more automated system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17120488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Dis Intell Q Rep        ISSN: 1447-4514


  9 in total

1.  Continued dominance of pandemic A(H1N1) 2009 influenza in Victoria, Australia in 2010.

Authors:  Kristina Grant; Lucinda Franklin; Marlena Kaczmarek; Aeron Hurt; Renata Kostecki; Heath Kelly; James Fielding
Journal:  Western Pac Surveill Response J       Date:  2011-08-31

2.  Retrospective forecasting of the 2010-2014 Melbourne influenza seasons using multiple surveillance systems.

Authors:  R Moss; A Zarebski; P Dawson; J M McCAW
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 4.434

3.  Quantifying differences in the epidemic curves from three influenza surveillance systems: a nonlinear regression analysis.

Authors:  E G Thomas; J M McCAW; H A Kelly; K A Grant; J McVERNON
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.434

4.  Hospital-based influenza morbidity and mortality surveillance system for influenza-like illnesses: a comparison with national influenza surveillance systems.

Authors:  Yu Bin Seo; Joon Young Song; Hee Jin Cheong; Young Duck Cho; Seong-Heon Wie; Hye Won Jeong; Woo Joo Kim
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  Telephone triage service data for detection of influenza-like illness.

Authors:  W Katherine Yih; Kathryn S Teates; Allyson Abrams; Ken Kleinman; Martin Kulldorff; Robert Pinner; Robert Harmon; Stanley Wang; Richard Platt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Strategies to improve global influenza surveillance: a decision tool for policymakers.

Authors:  Melinda Moore; Edward Chan; Nicole Lurie; Agnes Gereben Schaefer; Danielle M Varda; John A Zambrano
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Influenza activity in Europe during eight seasons (1999-2007): an evaluation of the indicators used to measure activity and an assessment of the timing, length and course of peak activity (spread) across Europe.

Authors:  John Paget; Richard Marquet; Adam Meijer; Koos van der Velden
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  Exploring a proposed WHO method to determine thresholds for seasonal influenza surveillance.

Authors:  Ee Laine Tay; Kristina Grant; Martyn Kirk; Anthony Mounts; Heath Kelly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Assessment of ambulance dispatch data for surveillance of influenza-like illness in Melbourne, Australia.

Authors:  M D Coory; H Kelly; V Tippett
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 2.427

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.