Literature DB >> 17119703

Diametral tensile strength of composite resins submitted to different activation techniques.

Denise Sá Maia Casselli1, Claudia Cia Worschech, Luis Alexandre Maffei Sartini Paulillo, Carlos Tadeu Dos Santos Dias.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diametral tensile strength (DTS) of composite resins submitted to different curing techniques. Four composite resins were tested in this study: Targis (Ivoclar), Solidex (Shofu), Charisma (Heraeus-Kulzer) and Filtek Z250 (3M Espe). Sixty-four cylindrical specimens were prepared and divided into eight groups according to each polymerization technique (n = 8). The indirect composite resins (Targis and Solidex) were polymerized with their respective curing systems (Targis Power and EDG-lux); Charisma and Filtek Z250 were light-cured with conventional polymerization (halogen light) and additionally, with post-curing systems. Specimens were stored in artificial saliva at 37 degrees C for one week. DTS tests were performed in a Universal Testing Machine (0.5 mm/min). The data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA and Duncan tests. The results were (MPa): Z250/EDG-lux: 69.04 feminine; Z250/Targis Power: 68.57 feminine; Z250/conventional polymerization: 60.75b; Charisma/Targis Power: 52.34c; Charisma/conventional polymerization: 49.17c; Charisma/EDG-lux: 47.98c; Solidex: 36.62d; Targis: 32.86d. The results reveal that the post-cured Z250 composite resin showed the highest DTS means. Charisma composite presented no significant differences when activation techniques were compared. Direct composite resins presented higher DTS values than indirect resins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17119703     DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242006000300006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Oral Res        ISSN: 1806-8324


  7 in total

1.  Interpreting finite element results for brittle materials in endodontic restorations.

Authors:  Antonio Pérez-González; José L Iserte-Vilar; Carmen González-Lluch
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 2.819

2.  Properties of Experimental Dental Composites Containing Antibacterial Silver-Releasing Filler.

Authors:  Robert Stencel; Jacek Kasperski; Wojciech Pakieła; Anna Mertas; Elżbieta Bobela; Izabela Barszczewska-Rybarek; Grzegorz Chladek
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Comparative evaluation of the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of paracore®, flourocore®2+, and multicore® resin-based core build-up materials - An in vitro study.

Authors:  Ankita Sharma; Prashant Purandhar Shetty; Afzal Ali; Monika Bhardwaj; Deepa Dubey; Swati Chhabra
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2022-04-01

4.  Influence of restorative technique, Bevelling and aging on composite bonding to sectioned incisal edges: A comparative in vitro study.

Authors:  Pradeep K Poojary; Shreetha Bhandary; Raghu Srinivasan; Farhat Nasreen; J Pramod; Mc Mahesh
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-01

5.  Can onlay's be an alternative restoration for severely damaged primary teeth.

Authors:  Begum Gok Coban; Zuhal Kirzioglu; Ayse Ceren Altun
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

6.  Fluorinated Montmorillonite and 3YSZ as the Inorganic Fillers in Fluoride-Releasing and Rechargeable Dental Composition Resin.

Authors:  Keng-Yuan Li; Cheng-Chia Tsai; Tzu-Chieh Lin; Yin-Lin Wang; Feng-Huei Lin; Chun-Pin Lin
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.329

7.  Fluorinated Montmorillonite Composite Resin as a Dental Pit and Fissure Sealant.

Authors:  Keng-Yuan Li; Cheng-Chia Tsai; Chih-Hsiang Fang; Yin-Lin Wang; Feng-Huei Lin; Chun-Pin Lin
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.329

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.