Literature DB >> 17119424

Aesthetic results of fronto-orbital correction in trigonocephaly.

Denise E Hilling1, Irene M J Mathijssen, J Michiel Vaandrager.   

Abstract

The aesthetic results of craniofacial surgery for trigonocephaly were evaluated by a panel assessment using a scoring system based on deformities typical for this type of craniosynostosis. In this retrospective study pre-and postoperative photographs of 45 patients were scored for items typical for trigonocephaly: shape of the forehead, hypotelorism, and temporal depression. Each item was quantified as normal or absent (0 points), a mild deformity (1 point) or a severe deformity (2 points). Preoperatively, the most obvious deformity was temporal depression and this remained to be the most obvious deformity after surgery. There was a good overall correction of the presenting deformities with a decline in the mean score preoperatively from 4.49-1.13 postoperatively. There was a significant weak correlation between pre- and postoperative score only for hypotelorism. This indicates that the severity of the initial disease is not a major contributor to the final surgical result. Furthermore, surgical outcome seemed to be stable over time and was not influenced by the timing of surgery when surgery was scheduled between the ages of 6-15 months. Early craniofacial correction for trigonocephaly results in a stable, acceptable aesthetic result on which the initial deformity has little effect. The most common associated craniofacial characteristics are well- to very well-corrected when surgery is performed within the first 6-15 months. Main focus of deformity on short and long term remains the temporal depression, and thus requires extra attention during surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17119424     DOI: 10.1097/01.scs.0000230018.39272.67

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  6 in total

1.  Guideline for Care of Patients With the Diagnoses of Craniosynostosis: Working Group on Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Irene M J Mathijssen
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.046

2.  Control of metopic emissary veins in trigonocephaly surgery. Technical note.

Authors:  Federico di Rocco; Arnaud Gleizal; Laura Lohkamp; Alexandru Szathmari; Christian Paulus; Carmine Mottolese
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 3.  Anterior fronto-orbital remodeling for trigonocephay.

Authors:  Federico Di Rocco; Eric Arnaud; Daniel Marchac; Estelle Vergnaud; Thomas Baugnon; Antonio Vecchione; Dominique Renier
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Assessing aesthetic outcomes after trigonocephaly correction.

Authors:  Philipp Metzler; Wolfgang Zemann; Christine Jacobsen; Heinz-Theo Lübbers; Klaus Wilhelm Grätz; Joachim Anton Obwegeser
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-02-17

Review 5.  Metopic synostosis.

Authors:  Jacques van der Meulen
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Outcomes of Surgical Management of Metopic Synostosis : A Retrospective Study of 18 Cases.

Authors:  Mohamed E Elhawary; Mohammed Adawi; Mohamed Gabr
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2021-09-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.