OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to test the safety and metabolic effects of a novel beta(3)-adrenoreceptor agonist (TAK-677) in humans. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-five obese (body mass index = 33.9 +/- 2.1 kg/m2, mean +/- se) men and women (31.4 +/- 0.9 yr) participated in a double-blind placebo-controlled study at an institutional research center. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized to 0.1 mg TAK-677 twice daily (BID) (n = 21), 0.5 mg TAK-677 BID (n = 22), or placebo BID (n = 22) for 29 d. OUTCOMES: Drug safety, 24-h respiratory quotient (RQ), 24-h energy expenditure (EE), body composition, fat distribution, and fasting plasma concentration of substrates and hormones were assessed. An acute-response study was also conducted. RESULTS: The drug was well tolerated by all participants; however, heart rate was elevated (9 +/- 2 beats per minute) with the 0.5-mg BID dose. After 28 d of treatment and when compared with placebo, there was no change in 24-h RQ with either 0.1-mg BID (P = 0.1) or 0.5-mg BID (P = 1.0) doses of TAK-677. However, TAK, 0.5 mg BID, resulted in a small increase in 24-h EE that was significantly different from placebo [change from baseline, 13 +/- 17 (0.5 mg BID) vs.-39 +/- 18 (placebo) kcal/d, P < 0.05]. Changes in weight, fat-free mass, and abdominal fat depots (visceral or sc) were not different between the three groups, nor were changes in fasting insulin, free fatty acid, or glucose concentrations. CONCLUSION:TAK-677 has no effect on 24-h RQ or fat oxidation but does slightly increase 24-h EE at the highest dose (0.5 mg BID). The acute studies showed large interindividual variability in plasma concentrations of TAK-677 indicating some possible problems with bioavailability and therefore efficacy.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to test the safety and metabolic effects of a novel beta(3)-adrenoreceptor agonist (TAK-677) in humans. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-five obese (body mass index = 33.9 +/- 2.1 kg/m2, mean +/- se) men and women (31.4 +/- 0.9 yr) participated in a double-blind placebo-controlled study at an institutional research center. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized to 0.1 mg TAK-677 twice daily (BID) (n = 21), 0.5 mg TAK-677 BID (n = 22), or placebo BID (n = 22) for 29 d. OUTCOMES: Drug safety, 24-h respiratory quotient (RQ), 24-h energy expenditure (EE), body composition, fat distribution, and fasting plasma concentration of substrates and hormones were assessed. An acute-response study was also conducted. RESULTS: The drug was well tolerated by all participants; however, heart rate was elevated (9 +/- 2 beats per minute) with the 0.5-mg BID dose. After 28 d of treatment and when compared with placebo, there was no change in 24-h RQ with either 0.1-mg BID (P = 0.1) or 0.5-mg BID (P = 1.0) doses of TAK-677. However, TAK, 0.5 mg BID, resulted in a small increase in 24-h EE that was significantly different from placebo [change from baseline, 13 +/- 17 (0.5 mg BID) vs.-39 +/- 18 (placebo) kcal/d, P < 0.05]. Changes in weight, fat-free mass, and abdominal fat depots (visceral or sc) were not different between the three groups, nor were changes in fasting insulin, free fatty acid, or glucose concentrations. CONCLUSION: TAK-677 has no effect on 24-h RQ or fat oxidation but does slightly increase 24-h EE at the highest dose (0.5 mg BID). The acute studies showed large interindividual variability in plasma concentrations of TAK-677 indicating some possible problems with bioavailability and therefore efficacy.
Authors: Aaron M Cypess; Yih-Chieh Chen; Cathy Sze; Ke Wang; Jeffrey English; Onyee Chan; Ashley R Holman; Ilan Tal; Matthew R Palmer; Gerald M Kolodny; C Ronald Kahn Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-06-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Aaron M Cypess; Lauren S Weiner; Carla Roberts-Toler; Elisa Franquet Elía; Skyler H Kessler; Peter A Kahn; Jeffrey English; Kelly Chatman; Sunia A Trauger; Alessandro Doria; Gerald M Kolodny Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 27.287
Authors: Matthew D Lynes; Luiz O Leiria; Morten Lundh; Alexander Bartelt; Farnaz Shamsi; Tian Lian Huang; Hirokazu Takahashi; Michael F Hirshman; Christian Schlein; Alexandra Lee; Lisa A Baer; Francis J May; Fei Gao; Niven R Narain; Emily Y Chen; Michael A Kiebish; Aaron M Cypess; Matthias Blüher; Laurie J Goodyear; Gökhan S Hotamisligil; Kristin I Stanford; Yu-Hua Tseng Journal: Nat Med Date: 2017-03-27 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Alison S Baskin; Joyce D Linderman; Robert J Brychta; Suzanne McGehee; Esti Anflick-Chames; Cheryl Cero; James W Johnson; Alana E O'Mara; Laura A Fletcher; Brooks P Leitner; Courtney J Duckworth; Shan Huang; Hongyi Cai; H Martin Garraffo; Corina M Millo; William Dieckmann; Vladimir Tolstikov; Emily Y Chen; Fei Gao; Niven R Narain; Michael A Kiebish; Peter J Walter; Peter Herscovitch; Kong Y Chen; Aaron M Cypess Journal: Diabetes Date: 2018-07-06 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Brian S Finlin; Hasiyet Memetimin; Amy L Confides; Ildiko Kasza; Beibei Zhu; Hemendra J Vekaria; Brianna Harfmann; Kelly A Jones; Zachary R Johnson; Philip M Westgate; Caroline M Alexander; Patrick G Sullivan; Esther E Dupont-Versteegden; Philip A Kern Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2018-08-09
Authors: Navya Murugesan; Kaylee Woodard; Rahul Ramaraju; Frank L Greenway; Ann A Coulter; Candida J Rebello Journal: J Med Food Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 2.786