Literature DB >> 17118738

Single- versus double-layer uterine incision closure and uterine rupture.

Cynthia Gyamfi1, Gabor Juhasz, Phyllis Gyamfi, Yair Blumenfeld, Joanne L Stone.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether closure of the uterine incision with one or two layers changes uterine rupture or vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) success rates.
METHODS: Subjects with one previous cesarean section by documented transverse uterine incision that attempted VBAC were identified. Exclusion criteria included lack of documentation of the type of closure of the previous uterine incision, multiple gestation, more than one previous cesarean section, and previous scar other than low transverse. Uterine rupture and VBAC success rates were compared between those with single-layer and double-layer uterine closure. Time interval between deliveries, birth weight, body mass index (BMI), and history of previous VBAC were evaluated as possible confounders.
RESULTS: Of 948 subjects identified, 913 had double-layer closure and 35 had single-layer closure. The uterine rupture rate was significantly higher in the single-layer closure group (8.6% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.015). This finding persisted when controlling for previous VBAC, induction, birth weight >4000 g, delivery interval >19 months, and BMI >29 (OR 8.01, 95% CI 1.96-32.79). There was no difference in VBAC success rate (74.3% vs. 77%, p = 0.685).
CONCLUSION: Single-layer uterine closure may be more likely to result in uterine rupture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17118738     DOI: 10.1080/14767050600849383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  6 in total

1.  Anterior uterine wall: normal and abnormal CT and MRI findings after cesarean section.

Authors:  Ali Devrim Karaosmanoğlu; Altan Güneş; Mustafa Nasuh Özmen; Deniz Akata
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

2.  The never ending debate single-layer versus double-layer closure of the uterine incision at cesarean section.

Authors:  C V Hegde
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-07-23

Review 3.  A review of Caesarean section techniques and postoperative thromboprophylaxis at a tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Chang Qi Hester Lau; Tuck Chin Tiffany Wong; Eng Loy Tan; Devendra Kanagalingam
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 4.  Techniques for caesarean section.

Authors:  G J Hofmeyr; M Mathai; A Shah; N Novikova
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

5.  Operative technique at caesarean delivery and risk of complete uterine rupture in a subsequent trial of labour at term. A registry case-control study.

Authors:  Dorthe L A Thisted; Laust H Mortensen; Lone Hvidman; Lone Krebs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Uterine closure in cesarean delivery: a new technique.

Authors:  Km Babu; Navneet Magon
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2012-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.