Literature DB >> 17118715

Mammalian single-strand break repair: mechanisms and links with chromatin.

Keith W Caldecott1.   

Abstract

Thousands of cellular single-strand breaks (SSBs) arise in cells each day, from attack of deoxyribose and DNA bases by reactive oxygen species and other electrophilic molecules, and from the intrinsic instability of DNA. If not repaired, SSBs can disrupt transcription and replication and can be converted into potentially clastogenic and/or lethal DNA double-strand breaks. Here, I present an updated model for the repair of SSBs, and speculate on the possible impact of chromatin structure and remodelling on single-strand break repair (SSBR) processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17118715     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  59 in total

Review 1.  DNA damage response.

Authors:  Giuseppina Giglia-Mari; Angelika Zotter; Wim Vermeulen
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Removal of reactive oxygen species-induced 3'-blocked ends by XPF-ERCC1.

Authors:  Laura A Fisher; Laura Samson; Tadayoshi Bessho
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 3.  Oxidative genome damage and its repair: implications in aging and neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Muralidhar L Hegde; Anil K Mantha; Tapas K Hazra; Kishor K Bhakat; Sankar Mitra; Bartosz Szczesny
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 5.432

4.  Terminally differentiated muscle cells are defective in base excision DNA repair and hypersensitive to oxygen injury.

Authors:  Laura Narciso; Paola Fortini; Deborah Pajalunga; Annapaola Franchitto; Pingfang Liu; Paolo Degan; Mathilde Frechet; Bruce Demple; Marco Crescenzi; Eugenia Dogliotti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Interaction between PARP-1 and ATR in mouse fibroblasts is blocked by PARP inhibition.

Authors:  Padmini S Kedar; Donna F Stefanick; Julie K Horton; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-08-22

6.  Chk2-dependent phosphorylation of XRCC1 in the DNA damage response promotes base excision repair.

Authors:  Wen-Cheng Chou; Hui-Chun Wang; Fen-Hwa Wong; Shian-ling Ding; Pei-Ei Wu; Sheau-Yann Shieh; Chen-Yang Shen
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 7.  Two DNA repair gene polymorphisms on the risk of gastrointestinal cancers: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yue Hu; Min Zhou; Kang Li; Kai Zhang; Xiangquan Kong; Yamei Zheng; Jianxu Li; Li Liu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-11-08

Review 8.  Accumulation of nuclear DNA damage or neuron loss: molecular basis for a new approach to understanding selective neuronal vulnerability in neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Ivona Brasnjevic; Patrick R Hof; Harry W M Steinbusch; Christoph Schmitz
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-05-23

9.  Cell context-dependent involvement of ATR in early stages of retroviral replication.

Authors:  Yi-Xin Yang; Vincent Guen; Jonathan Richard; Eric A Cohen; Lionel Berthoux
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 3.616

10.  Direct and indirect roles of RECQL4 in modulating base excision repair capacity.

Authors:  Shepherd H Schurman; Mohammad Hedayati; ZhengMing Wang; Dharmendra K Singh; Elzbieta Speina; Yongqing Zhang; Kevin Becker; Margaret Macris; Patrick Sung; David M Wilson; Deborah L Croteau; Vilhelm A Bohr
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 6.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.