Literature DB >> 17118688

Respective contributions of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty to the management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Hervé Deramond1, Guillaume Saliou, Mathieu Aveillan, Pierre Lehmann, Jean Noël Vallée.   

Abstract

Among individuals aged 50-80 years, 5-20% have one or more vertebral crush fractures. One-third of these patients require treatment for acute or chronic pain. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty were introduced over the last two decades as treatments for incapacitating pain from osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Both techniques proved effective and safe in numerous retrospective and prospective studies. They now deserve to be incorporated into the standard treatment strategy for painful and incapacitating vertebral fractures. Kyphoplasty seeks not only to stabilize the vertebra, but also to correct the kyphosis induced by the vertebral body collapse. However, the correction is often limited (less than 15 degrees ) and has not been shown to increase the benefits in terms of pain relief or quality-of-life improvement, compared to vertebroplasty. Kyphoplasty is more costly than vertebroplasty, which is therefore emerging as the treatment of choice. However, a randomized double-blind trial comparing vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty is needed. Furthermore, a randomized comparison of vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty versus noninterventional treatment is needed in patients admitted for pain immediately after a vertebral crush fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17118688     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2006.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Joint Bone Spine        ISSN: 1297-319X            Impact factor:   4.929


  11 in total

1.  Balloon kyphoplasty for acute osteoporotic compression fractures.

Authors:  T Yang; S Liu; X Lv; X Wu
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Computed tomography-guided vertebroplasty using a stereotactic guidance system (stereo-guide).

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2010-05-31

Review 3.  Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Allen W Burton; Basem Hamid
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2008-01

4.  Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: friends or foes?

Authors:  M Muto; V Perrotta; G Guarnieri; A Lavanga; P Vassallo; R Reginelli; A Rotondo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Clinical relevance of pain patterns in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Tae-Hoon Doo; Dong-Ah Shin; Hyoung-Ihl Kim; Dong-Gyu Shin; Hyo-Joon Kim; Ji-Hun Chung; Jung-Ok Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 6.  Diagnosis and treatment of bone disease in multiple myeloma: spotlight on spinal involvement.

Authors:  Patrizia Tosi
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2013-12-08

7.  The efficacy of a percutaneous expandable titanium device in anatomical reduction of vertebral compression fractures of the thoracolumbar spine.

Authors:  Saleh S Baeesa; Antonio Krueger; Francisco A Aragón; David C Noriega
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.484

8.  Vertebral augmentation by kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty: 8 years experience outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Kaan Yaltirik; Ahmed M Ashour; Conner R Reis; Selçuk Özdoğan; Başar Atalay
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

9.  Treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with intraosseous vacuum phenomena using high-viscosity bone cement via bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Dan Guo; Jun Cai; Shengfei Zhang; Liang Zhang; Xinmin Feng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Time to revisit contraindications of vertebroplasty- A retrospective study of osteoporotic burst fracture operated with vertebroplasty and short segment fixation.

Authors:  Deepak Joshi; Ghanshyam Kakadiya; Umair Attar
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.