Literature DB >> 17118483

Morphometric analysis of face in dysmorphology.

Ashwin B Dalal1, Shubha R Phadke.   

Abstract

Dysmorphology refers to study of human congenital malformations (birth defects). Most of the case reporting in dysmorphology is subjective and is based on experience of the reporting clinician. We have used the methods of geometric morphometrics to analyze the variation in faces of normal individuals and those with dysmorphic syndrome. We obtained photographs of 20 individuals with Rubinstein Taybi syndrome and 30 normal, age and sex matched individuals. The photographs were digitized with 16 landmarks on the face to obtain 32 "x" and "y" co-ordinates. These co-ordinates were then subjected to generalized procrustes superimposition in order to normalize for effects of size, rotation and position of image. The procrustes residuals thus obtained were then subjected to principal component analysis. The principal component analysis resulted in extraction of three important principal components explaining 41%, 17% and 14% of variance, respectively. Discriminant analysis could differentiate the two groups using first two principal component scores for each individual, with a predictive accuracy of 76% (Wilks lambda=0.725, chi2=15.09, d.f.=2, p=0.001). Binary logistic regression analysis showed predictive accuracy of 78% based on this model. The utility of the subjective evaluation of facial characteristics is multifold. The results of the analysis can be used as representatives of the facial dysmorphism for any genotype-phenotype association study. We conclude that application of the principles of geometric morphometrics to study of shape variation in facies of patients with dysmorphic syndromes appears to be a promising new area of research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17118483     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2006.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed        ISSN: 0169-2607            Impact factor:   5.428


  6 in total

1.  Shape-based classification of 3D facial data to support 22q11.2DS craniofacial research.

Authors:  Katarzyna Wilamowska; Jia Wu; Carrie Heike; Linda Shapiro
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  The use of 3D face shape modelling in dysmorphology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  Large-scale objective phenotyping of 3D facial morphology.

Authors:  Peter Hammond; Michael Suttie
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 4.878

4.  Craniofacial characteristics of fragile X syndrome in mouse and man.

Authors:  Inge Heulens; Michael Suttie; Andrei Postnov; Nora De Clerck; Concetta S Perrotta; Teresa Mattina; Francesca Faravelli; Francesca Forzano; R Frank Kooy; Peter Hammond
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Computer face-matching technology using two-dimensional photographs accurately matches the facial gestalt of unrelated individuals with the same syndromic form of intellectual disability.

Authors:  Tracy Dudding-Byth; Anne Baxter; Elizabeth G Holliday; Anna Hackett; Sheridan O'Donnell; Susan M White; John Attia; Han Brunner; Bert de Vries; David Koolen; Tjitske Kleefstra; Seshika Ratwatte; Carlos Riveros; Steve Brain; Brian C Lovell
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.563

6.  Diagnostically relevant facial gestalt information from ordinary photos.

Authors:  Quentin Ferry; Julia Steinberg; Caleb Webber; David R FitzPatrick; Chris P Ponting; Andrew Zisserman; Christoffer Nellåker
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 8.140

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.