Richard Garza1, Kevin Albuquerque, Anil Sethi. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA. rgarza3@lumc.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: We performed a retrospective analysis of doses to normal critical structures in 26 women with left-sided breast tumors treated with a high-dose-rate single source brachytherapy (SSB) system, versus whole breast external beam tangent fields (EBTF) using a computer model. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Each patient's EBTF radiation plan consisted of ipsilateral tangent fields normalized to 46 Gy. A complementary SSB radiation plan was designed to deliver 34 Gy in 10 fractions at 1cm into tissue enclosing a sphere of diameter 4.6 cm at tumor bed, simulating our institution's experience with the MammoSite applicator. Critical structure volumes and doses analyzed included the volume of whole heart and left ventricle receiving >25 Gy, and left lung (LL) receiving 20 and 13 Gy for EBTF plans. For SSB we determined the linear quadratic 2-Gy-equivalent high-dose-rate doses of 23.4, 20, and 14 Gy to be equivalent to 25, 20, and 13 Gy, respectively. We then compared the two doses for each critical structure. RESULTS: The percent of whole heart receiving >25 Gy equivalent using EBTF and SSB was 2% and 0% (mean dose 2.52 vs. 1.65 Gy), left ventricle receiving >25 Gy using EBTF and SSB was 3% and 0% (mean dose 3.78 vs. 2.68 Gy), LL receiving >20 Gy using EBTF and SSB was 11.5% and 0.5%, and LL receiving >13 Gy using EBTF and SSB was 12.6% and 1.85% (mean dose to LL was 6.06 Gy for EBTF vs. 2.25 Gy for SSB), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to EBTF, breast brachytherapy with SSB is associated with a significant decrease in mean dose and percentage volume receiving a given dose for each organ.
PURPOSE: We performed a retrospective analysis of doses to normal critical structures in 26 women with left-sided breast tumors treated with a high-dose-rate single source brachytherapy (SSB) system, versus whole breast external beam tangent fields (EBTF) using a computer model. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Each patient's EBTF radiation plan consisted of ipsilateral tangent fields normalized to 46 Gy. A complementary SSB radiation plan was designed to deliver 34 Gy in 10 fractions at 1cm into tissue enclosing a sphere of diameter 4.6 cm at tumor bed, simulating our institution's experience with the MammoSite applicator. Critical structure volumes and doses analyzed included the volume of whole heart and left ventricle receiving >25 Gy, and left lung (LL) receiving 20 and 13 Gy for EBTF plans. For SSB we determined the linear quadratic 2-Gy-equivalent high-dose-rate doses of 23.4, 20, and 14 Gy to be equivalent to 25, 20, and 13 Gy, respectively. We then compared the two doses for each critical structure. RESULTS: The percent of whole heart receiving >25 Gy equivalent using EBTF and SSB was 2% and 0% (mean dose 2.52 vs. 1.65 Gy), left ventricle receiving >25 Gy using EBTF and SSB was 3% and 0% (mean dose 3.78 vs. 2.68 Gy), LL receiving >20 Gy using EBTF and SSB was 11.5% and 0.5%, and LL receiving >13 Gy using EBTF and SSB was 12.6% and 1.85% (mean dose to LL was 6.06 Gy for EBTF vs. 2.25 Gy for SSB), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to EBTF, breast brachytherapy with SSB is associated with a significant decrease in mean dose and percentage volume receiving a given dose for each organ.
Authors: William C Dooley; James C Wurzer; Mohamed Megahy; Gary Schreiber; Tapan Roy; Gary Proulx; Susan Laduzinsky; Steven Lane; James Dalzell; Kambiz Dowlatshahi; Dwelvin Simmons; John P Thropay; Harish Ahuja; Peter Beitsch; Randall W Holt; Charles A Lee Journal: Onco Targets Ther Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Alexandra J Stewart; Desmond A O'Farrell; Robert A Cormack; Jorgen L Hansen; Atif J Khan; Subhakar Mutyala; Phillip M Devlin Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2008-11-19 Impact factor: 3.481