PURPOSE: To carry out a comparative assessment of intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) doses to tumor, bladder, and rectum based on orthogonal films and contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-five ICBT procedures with CT/MRI compatible applicator and CECT scans were evaluated. Doses to Point A, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurement (ICRU) reference points for maximum bladder (B max(ICRU)) and rectum (R max(ICRU)) localized from orthogonal films were compared with CECT delineated tumor, bladder (B max(CECT)), and rectum (R max(CECT)) doses, respectively. The 95th and 90th percentile bladder (B 95(CECT) and B 90(CECT)) and rectal (R 95(CECT) and R 90(CECT)) doses based on CECT were also estimated. RESULTS: Mean percentage tumor volume encompassed within the prescribed dose of 600 cGy to Point A was 88.8%. Mean B max(ICRU), B max(CECT), R max(ICRU), and R max(CECT) were 631.3 cGy, 1221.4 cGy, 454.8 cGy, and 526.9 cGy, respectively. Paired mean differences were significant between B max(ICRU) and B max(CECT) or B 95(CECT) (both p < 0.001); R max(ICRU) and R max(CECT) (p = 0.005) or R 90(CECT) (p < 0.001), whereas insignificant for B max(ICRU) and B 90(CECT) (p = 0.281), and R max(ICRU) and R 95(CECT) (p = 0.372). CONCLUSIONS: Prescription based on Point A ICBT doses could lead to uncertainty and underdosage in tumor. ICRU 38 maximum bladder and rectal doses significantly underestimate the maximum doses to these organs and represent the 90th and 95th percentile of the maximum doses to these organs, respectively.
PURPOSE: To carry out a comparative assessment of intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) doses to tumor, bladder, and rectum based on orthogonal films and contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-five ICBT procedures with CT/MRI compatible applicator and CECT scans were evaluated. Doses to Point A, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurement (ICRU) reference points for maximum bladder (B max(ICRU)) and rectum (R max(ICRU)) localized from orthogonal films were compared with CECT delineated tumor, bladder (B max(CECT)), and rectum (R max(CECT)) doses, respectively. The 95th and 90th percentile bladder (B 95(CECT) and B 90(CECT)) and rectal (R 95(CECT) and R 90(CECT)) doses based on CECT were also estimated. RESULTS: Mean percentage tumor volume encompassed within the prescribed dose of 600 cGy to Point A was 88.8%. Mean B max(ICRU), B max(CECT), R max(ICRU), and R max(CECT) were 631.3 cGy, 1221.4 cGy, 454.8 cGy, and 526.9 cGy, respectively. Paired mean differences were significant between B max(ICRU) and B max(CECT) or B 95(CECT) (both p < 0.001); R max(ICRU) and R max(CECT) (p = 0.005) or R 90(CECT) (p < 0.001), whereas insignificant for B max(ICRU) and B 90(CECT) (p = 0.281), and R max(ICRU) and R 95(CECT) (p = 0.372). CONCLUSIONS: Prescription based on Point A ICBT doses could lead to uncertainty and underdosage in tumor. ICRU 38 maximum bladder and rectal doses significantly underestimate the maximum doses to these organs and represent the 90th and 95th percentile of the maximum doses to these organs, respectively.
Authors: Hayeon Kim; Yongsook C Lee; Stanley H Benedict; Brandon Dyer; Michael Price; Yi Rong; Ananth Ravi; Eric Leung; Sushil Beriwal; Mark E Bernard; Jyoti Mayadev; Jessica R L Leif; Ying Xiao Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Primoz Petric; Robert Hudej; Peter Rogelj; Mateja Blas; Barbara Segedin; Helena Barbara Zobec Logar; Johannes Carl Athanasios Dimopoulos Journal: Radiol Oncol Date: 2012-04-11 Impact factor: 2.991