| Literature DB >> 17118191 |
Danielle A W Wolvers1, Wendy M R van Herpen-Broekmans, Margot H G M Logman, Reggy P J van der Wielen, Ruud Albers.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Supplementation of nutritional deficiencies helps to improve immune function and resistance to infections in malnourished subjects. However, the suggested benefits of dietary supplementation for immune function in healthy well nourished subjects is less clear. Among the food constituents frequently associated with beneficial effects on immune function are micronutrients such as vitamin C, vitamin E, beta-carotene and zinc, and colostrum. This study was designed to investigate the effects these ingredients on immune function markers in healthy volunteers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 17118191 PMCID: PMC1676011 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-5-28
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr J ISSN: 1475-2891 Impact factor: 3.271
Composition of study products1. Content of the study products was determined at baseline and for micronutrients E and C and β-carotene also at week 6 and week 10. Of each group, both mango- and orange flavored products were analyzed. Data are presented as the contents of 2 packages, which represents a daily dose.
| Energy* (kJ) | 628 | 627 | 626 | 625 | 625 | 624 | 623 | 622 | |
| Moisture (%)* | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 2.25 ± 0.25 | 2.65 ± 0.15 | 3.15 ± 0.25 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.2 | 3.1 ± 0.1 | 3.1 ± 0.1 | |
| Fat (%)* | 5.5 ± 0.1 | 5.45 ± 0.05 | 5.5 ± 0.1 | 5.9 ± 0.3 | 6.2 ± 0 | 6.4 ± 0.1 | 6.6 v 0.2 | 6.2 ± 0 | |
| Protein (%)* | 17.3 ± 0.1 | 17.6 ± 0.1 | 16.9 ± 0.1 | 17.1 ± 0.25 | 17.1 ± 0.2 | 16.9 ± 0.15 | 16.9 ± 0.15 | 17.2 ± 0.3 | |
| IgG (mg)*2 | - | - | 422 | 466 | - | - | 430 | 416 | |
| Vitamin E (mg) | |||||||||
| Baseline | 200 | - | - | - | - | 333 ± 8 | 314 ± 1.4 | 296 ± 8.8 | 293 ± 1 |
| week 6 | - | - | - | - | 272 ± 2.7 | 278 ± 4.2 | 268 ± 0.5 | 264 ± 0.3 | |
| week 10 | - | - | - | - | 281 ± 0.3 | 279 ± 2.8 | 290 ± 0.8 | 286 ± 0.2 | |
| β-carotene (mg) | |||||||||
| Baseline | 10 | - | - | - | - | 12.6 ± 0.2 | 13.2 ± 0.5 | 12.3 ± 0.4 | 12.2 ± 0.4 |
| week 6 | - | - | - | - | 11.0 ± 0 | 10.8 ± 0.2 | 11.2 ± 0,2 | 10.8 ± 0.4 | |
| week 10 | - | - | - | - | 12.7 ± 0.4 | 12.9 ± 0.1 | 12.6 ± 0.2 | 12.1 ± 0.2 | |
| Vitamin C (mg) | |||||||||
| Baseline | 250 | - | - | - | - | 365 ± 8 | 351 ± 6 | 369 ± 6 | 385 ± 10 |
| week 6 | - | - | - | - | 395 ± 15 | 381 ± 4 | 364 ± 17 | 345 ± 27 | |
| week 10 | - | - | - | - | 382 ± 6 | 386 ± 4 | 382 ± 5 | 390 ± 3 | |
| Zinc (mg) * | 15 | - | - | - | - | 14.6 ± 2.04 | 15.3 ± 1.83 | 15.09 ± 0.3 | 16.04 ± 1.28 |
* parameters identified by * were determined at baseline only. - not determined.
1 data are expressed as mean ± SD, except for (calculated) energy and IgG, which are given as means.
2IgG was determined by radioimmunodiffusion by Galagen Inc. Mean concentrations of 2 tests were reported without SD.
Baseline characteristics of subjects who completed the study
| Gender, n | |||||
| Total | 131 | 31 | 33 | 32 | 35 |
| Men | 42 | 10 | 11 | 10 | 11 |
| Women | 89 | 21 | 22 | 22 | 24 |
| Age, years | |||||
| Total | 56.7 ± 10.0 | 56.0 ± 10.1 | 56.8 ± 10.2 | 57.5 ± 10.1 | 56.3 ± 9.9 |
| Men | 61.4 ± 10.1 | 57.7 ± 9.9 | 62.4 ± 10.9 | 61.9 ± 11.4 | 63.4 ± 8.5 |
| Women | 54.4 ± 9.2 | 55.2 ± 10.3 | 54.1 ± 8.9 | 55.5 ± 9.1 | 53.0 ± 8.8 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | |||||
| Total | 25.3 ± 2.7 | 25.1 ± 3.2 | 25.4 ± 2.50 | 24.9 ± 2.5 | 25.6 ± 2.5 |
| Men | 26.0 ± 2.6 | 26.5 ± 3.4 | 26.0 ± 2.3 | 26.0 ± 2.3 | 25.5 ± 2.5 |
| Women | 24.9 ± 2.7 | 24.5 ± 3.1 | 25.1 ± 2.6 | 24.3 ± 2.5 | 25.6 ± 2.5 |
| Vitamin E, μmol/L | |||||
| Total | 27.1 ± 7.2 | 27.3 ± 10.0 | 27.9 ± 6.3 | 26.9 ± 4.5 | 26.4 ± 7.2 |
| Men | 28.1 ± 9.7 | 33.6 ± 13.7 | 24.5 ± 6.6 | 25.8 ± 3.8 | 28.9 ± 10.5 |
| Women | 26.6 ± 5.6 | 24.3 ± 6.0 | 29.6 ± 5.6 | 27.4 ± 4.7 | 25.3 ± 4.9 |
| Tetanus titers, IU/L | |||||
| Total1 | - | 126 | 154 | 147 | 138 |
Data are represented as mean ± SD
1 Tetanus titers were determined at the screening examination, mean (95% CI)
Figure 1Plasma concentrations of vitamin C & E and β-carotene. Plasma concentrations of vitamin C & E and β-carotene were measured at base line, 6 and 10 weeks. Data are expressed as LSM (± 95% CI). Levels in the micronutrient groups (micronutrient group ▲ and micronutrient + colostrum group △) are significantly different from levels in non-vitamin group (control ■ and colostrum group □) with ** p < 0.0001.
response to tetanus and typoid vaccination
| Baseline | 126 (90.2 – 175) | 154 (111 – 212) | 147 (105 – 206) | 138 (101 – 189) |
| Week 8 | 2141 (1040 – 4407) | 4074 (2024 – 8200) | 3368 (1625 – 6982) | 5131 (2579 – 10208) |
| Week 10 | 3138 (1713 – 5748) | 4728 (2629 – 8500) | 4206 (2282 – 7753) | 5330 (3013 – 9431) |
| Baseline3 | 3.37 (2.24 – 5.07) | 3.93 (2.64 – 5.84) | 5.39 (3.54 – 8.20) | 6.48 (4.40 – 9.52) |
| Week 83 | 12.6 (9.02 – 17.6) | 16.5 (12.0 – 22.8) | 19.5 (13.9 – 27.5) | 21.6 (15.7 – 29.6) |
| Week 103 | 10.7 (7.67 – 14.8) | 14.0 (10.1 – 19.2) | 16.7 (11.9 – 23.4) | 18.4 (13.5 – 25.2) |
| Baseline | 1.21 (0.85 – 1.72) | 1.07 (0.76 – 1.51) | 1.36 (0.95 – 1.95) | 1.43 (1.03 – 1.99) |
| Week 8 | 2.70 (1.89 – 3.86) | 3.40 (2.40 – 4.81) | 3.49 (2.42 – 5.04) | 3.73 (2.65 – 5.24) |
| Week 10 | 1.80 (1.29 – 2.52) | 1.86 (1.35 – 2.57) | 2.24 (1.59 – 3.14) | 2.20 (1.60 – 3.01) |
1 values are expressed as lsmeans (95% CI).
2 n = 34 in serum at week 8, n = 33 for saliva at week 8.
3Micronutrient group (Micronutrients group and Colostrum + Micronutrients group) is significantly different from non-micronutrient group (Control group and Colostrum group) (P < 0.05).
Figure 2Delayed-type hypersensitivity response in two age groups. DTH responses were assessed using the CMI multitest at baseline and at 6 weeks. Because of significant interaction between age and treatment group (p < 0.05), the population was split around the median age of 56 y in younger (< 56 y) and older (> 56 y) subjects. Average age of the younger subjects was 48 ± 4 y, with a BMI of 24.5 ± 2.8, comprising 12 men and 52 women. The average age of the older subjects was 65 ± 6 y, with a BMI of 26.0 ± 2.3, comprising of 30 men and 36 women. Both age categories were evenly spread over the treatments with 15–19 subjects per treatment per age category. Data are reported as LSM of the mean increase in the number of positive responses (A) and increase of the cumulative diameter of the positive responses (B). Responses in the micronutrient groups (micronutrient (white) and micronutrient + colostrum group (hatched)) are significantly different from levels in non-vitamin group (control (black) and colostrum group (grey)) with * p < 0.05.
phagocytosis of opsonized E coli
| Control (n = 31) | Colostrum (n = 33) | Micronutrients (n = 31) | Colostrum + Micronutrients (n = 35) | |
| Granulocytes (% of leukocytes) | ||||
| Baseline | 47.9 (44.5 – 51.2) | 49.1 (45.8 – 52.3) | 49.7 (46.3 – 53.0) | 52.4 (49.3 – 55.6) |
| Week 6 | 49.5 (46.3 – 52.7) | 49.5 (46.4 – 52.6) | 50.0 (46.8 – 53.3) | 50.4 (47.3 – 53.4) |
| | ||||
| Positive granulocytes (% of total granulocytes) | ||||
| Baseline | 65.6 (62.5 – 68.6) | 63.1 (60.2 – 66.0) | 64.9 (61.8 – 67.9) | 65.2 (62.4 – 68.1) |
| Week 6 | 60.4 (57.2 – 63.6) | 58.4 (55.3 – 61.5) | 56.7(53.4 – 59.9) | 58.0 (55.0 – 61.0) |
| | ||||
| Granulocytes fluorescence mean | ||||
| Baseline | 422 (393 – 451) | 390 (362 – 418) | 410 (381 – 439) | 408 (381 – 435) |
| Week 6 | 450 (423 – 478) | 438 (411 – 465) | 407 (379 – 436) | 430 (404 – 456) |
| | ||||
1 values are expressed as lsmeans (95% CI)