Literature DB >> 17117284

Bone density testing in clinical practice.

E Michael Lewiecki1, João Lindolfo C Borges.   

Abstract

The diagnosis of osteoporosis and monitoring of treatment is a challenge for physicians due to the large number of available tests and complexities of interpretation. Bone mineral density (BMD) testing is a non-invasive measurement to assess skeletal health. The "gold-standard" technology for diagnosis and monitoring is dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the spine, hip, or forearm. Fracture risk can be predicted using DXA and other technologies at many skeletal sites. Despite guidelines for selecting patients for BMD testing and identifying those most likely to benefit from treatment, many patients are not being tested or receiving therapy. Even patients with very high risk of fracture, such as those on long-term glucocorticoid therapy or with prevalent fragility fractures, are often not managed appropriately. The optimal testing strategy varies according to local availability and affordability of BMD testing. The role of BMD testing to monitor therapy is still being defined, and interpretation of serial studies requires special attention to instrument calibration, acquisition technique, analysis, and precision assessment. BMD is usually reported as a T-score, the standard deviation variance of the patient's BMD compared to a normal young-adult reference population. BMD in postmenopausal women is classified as normal, osteopenia, or osteoporosis according to criteria established by the World Health Organization. Standardized methodologies are being developed to establish cost-effective intervention thresholds for pharmacological therapy based on T-score combined with clinical risk factors for fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17117284     DOI: 10.1590/s0004-27302006000400004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol        ISSN: 0004-2730


  8 in total

1.  Osteoporosis in adult Sri Lankan inflammatory bowel disease patients.

Authors:  Arjuna Priyadarsin de Silva; Aranjan Lionel Karunanayake; Thalahitiya Gamaralalage Iruka Dissanayaka; Anuradha Supun Dassanayake; Hewa Kattadi Kankanamgae Tilak Duminda; Arunasalam Pathmeswaran; Ananda Rajitha Wickramasinghe; Hithanadura Janaka de Silva
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Can Hip Fracture Prediction in Women be Estimated beyond Bone Mineral Density Measurement Alone?

Authors:  Piet Geusens; Tineke van Geel; Joop van den Bergh
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.346

3.  Assessment of osteoporotic alterations in type 2 diabetes: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Luciana Munhoz; Arthur R G Cortes; Emiko S Arita
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 4.  Imaging technologies for assessment of skeletal health in men.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  An Increased Serum N-Terminal Telopeptide of Type I Collagen, a Biochemical Marker of Increased Bone Resorption, Is Associated with Infliximab Therapy in Patients with Crohn's Disease.

Authors:  Ken Sugimoto; Kentaro Ikeya; Takayuki Iida; Shinsuke Kawasaki; Osamu Arai; Keita Umehara; Fumitoshi Watanabe; Shinya Tani; Shinji Oishi; Satoshi Osawa; Takayuki Yamamoto; Hiroyuki Hanai
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Osteoporosis and osteopathy markers in patients with mastocytosis.

Authors:  Nilüfer Alpay Kanıtez; Burak Erer; Öner Doğan; Nesimi Büyükbabani; Can Baykal; Dilşad Sindel; Refik Tanakol; Akif Selim Yavuz
Journal:  Turk J Haematol       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 1.831

Review 7.  Does excess weight interfere with bone mass accumulation during adolescence?

Authors:  Luciana Nunes Mosca; Valéria Nóbrega da Silva; Tamara Beres Lederer Goldberg
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 8.  Hip geometry and femoral neck fractures: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonny Karunia Fajar; Taufan Taufan; Muhammad Syarif; Azharuddin Azharuddin
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 5.191

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.