Literature DB >> 17116520

Cervicitis: to treat or not to treat? The role of patient preferences and decision analysis.

Jeanelle Sheeder1, Catherine Stevens-Simon, Dennis Lezotte, Judith Glazner, Stephen Scott.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mucopurulent cervicitis is neither a sensitive nor a specific indicator of antibiotic sensitive infection. This analysis examines the positive and negative ramifications of treating cervicitis empirically as a Chlamydial (CT) infection. It begins where prior analyses leave off, with the number of cases of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) prevented.
METHODS: Three treatments were compared: 1) treat empirically/refer partner; 2) test, treat, and base partner treatment on results; 3) test, base treatment on results. The outcomes were the physical sequelae of PID and the psychological sequelae of being diagnosed with CT in a hypothetical cohort of 500 teenagers with cervicitis, among whom the prevalence of CT averaged 33%, but ranged between 10% and 70%.
RESULTS: At a CT prevalence of 33%, Treatments 1 and 2 prevented three times as many cases of PID-related physical sequelae (n = 14) as Treatment 3 (n = 5). However, to prevent these 14 cases of physical sequelae, with Treatment 1, 163 teens needlessly suffer the psychological sequelae of a false CT diagnosis and with Treatment 2, 101 do so. The ratio of physical sequelae prevented to psychological sequelae caused, changed in relationship to the prevalence of CT, but was always numerically most favorable with Treatment 3. Moreover, it was the only therapeutic approach for which overall morbidity never exceeded the PID-related physical morbidity incurred in the absence of treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: By including the effects of over diagnosing and treating CT, we have demonstrated how the risks and benefits of empiric and nonempiric cervicitis therapy vary in relationship to CT prevalence. Failure to consider both the physical and the psychological aspects of patient well-being may mean that well-intentioned policies to reduce physical morbidity do not result in an overall improvement in health of teenagers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17116520     DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  2 in total

1.  Differences in Treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis by Ambulatory Care Setting.

Authors:  William S Pearson; Thomas L Gift; Jami S Leichliter; Wiley D Jenkins
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-12

2.  Understanding consumer preferences for care of adolescents with pelvic inflammatory disease.

Authors:  Maria Trent; Harold Lehmann; Arlene Butz; Carol Thompson; Qiang Qian; Kevin D Frick
Journal:  Med Ther Med Reprod Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.