Literature DB >> 17116417

Report of the IWGT working group on strategies and interpretation of regulatory in vivo tests I. Increases in micronucleated bone marrow cells in rodents that do not indicate genotoxic hazards.

D J Tweats1, D Blakey, R H Heflich, A Jacobs, S D Jacobsen, T Morita, T Nohmi, M R O'Donovan, Y F Sasaki, T Sofuni, R Tice.   

Abstract

In vivo genotoxicity tests play a pivotal role in genotoxicity testing batteries. They are used both to determine if potential genotoxicity observed in vitro is realised in vivo and to detect any genotoxic carcinogens that are poorly detected in vitro. It is recognised that individual in vivo genotoxicity tests have limited sensitivity but good specificity. Thus, a positive result from the established in vivo assays is taken as strong evidence for genotoxic carcinogenicity of the compound tested. However, there is a growing body of evidence that compound-related disturbances in the physiology of the rodents used in these assays can result in increases in micronucleated cells in the bone marrow that are not related to the intrinsic genotoxicity of the compound under test. For rodent bone marrow or peripheral blood micronucleus tests, these disturbances include changes in core body temperature (hypothermia and hyperthermia) and increases in erythropoiesis following prior toxicity to erythroblasts or by direct stimulation of cell division in these cells. This paper reviews relevant data from the literature and also previously unpublished data obtained from a questionnaire devised by the IWGT working group. Regulatory implications of these findings are discussed and flow diagrams have been provided to aid in interpretation and decision-making when such changes in physiology are suspected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17116417     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  11 in total

Review 1.  How accurate is in vitro prediction of carcinogenicity?

Authors:  Richard Maurice Walmsley; Nicholas Billinton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Dextran sulfate sodium mouse model of inflammatory bowel disease evaluated for systemic genotoxicity via blood micronucleus and Pig-a gene mutation assays.

Authors:  Christopher Kirby; Ayesha Baig; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Dorothea K Torous; Shuchang Tian; Priyanka Singh; Jeffrey C Bemis; Lawrence J Saubermann; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Effect of training data size and noise level on support vector machines virtual screening of genotoxic compounds from large compound libraries.

Authors:  Pankaj Kumar; Xiaohua Ma; Xianghui Liu; Jia Jia; Han Bucong; Ying Xue; Ze Rong Li; Sheng Yong Yang; Yu Quan Wei; Yu Zong Chen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Genotoxicity of carbon tetrachloride and the protective role of essential oil of Salvia officinalis L. in mice using chromosomal aberration, micronuclei formation, and comet assay.

Authors:  Kawthar Ae Diab; Maha A Fahmy; Zeinab M Hassan; Emad M Hassan; Adel B Salama; Enayat A Omara
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Genotoxicity of styrene-acrylonitrile trimer in brain, liver, and blood cells of weanling F344 rats.

Authors:  Cheryl A Hobbs; Rajendra S Chhabra; Leslie Recio; Michael Streicker; Kristine L Witt
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 3.216

6.  Evaluation of a 4-day repeated-dose micronucleus test in rat glandular stomach and colon using aneugens and non-genotoxic non-carcinogens.

Authors:  Emiko Okada; Yohei Fujiishi; Kazunori Narumi; Wakako Ohyama
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2022-04-11

7.  In Vivo Effects of Vanadium Pentoxide and Antioxidants (Ascorbic Acid and Alpha-Tocopherol) on Apoptotic, Cytotoxic, and Genotoxic Damage in Peripheral Blood of Mice.

Authors:  María Del Carmen García-Rodríguez; Lourdes Montserrat Hernández-Cortés; Mario Agustín Altamirano-Lozano
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 8.  A Novel Strategy to Predict Carcinogenicity of Antiparasitics Based on a Combination of DNA Lesions and Bacterial Mutagenicity Tests.

Authors:  Qianying Liu; Zhixin Lei; Feng Zhu; Awais Ihsan; Xu Wang; Zonghui Yuan
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-11-09

9.  Three dimensional and microphysiological bone marrow models detect in vivo positive compounds.

Authors:  Rhiannon David; Sarah Gee; Kainat Khan; Amy Wilson; Ann Doherty
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Testing of acetaminophen in support of the international multilaboratory in vivo rat Pig-a assay validation trial.

Authors:  Bas-Jan van der Leede; Sandy Weiner; Terry Van Doninck; Kathleen De Vlieger; Ann Schuermans; Fetene Tekle; Helena Geys; Marjolein van Heerden; Sandra De Jonghe; Jacky Van Gompel
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.