Literature DB >> 17115394

Evidence-based guidelines for using the Short Form 36 in cervical dystonia.

Stefan J Cano1, Alan J Thompson, Khailash Bhatia, Ray Fitzpatrick, Thomas T Warner, Jeremy C Hobart.   

Abstract

We aimed to provide evidence-based guidelines for using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) as an outcome measure in cervical dystonia (CD). To do this, we tested the hypothesized relationships between items, scales, and summary measures of the SF-36 using psychometric analyses in data from a postal survey of 235 people with CD. Although the majority of subscales performed adequately, the Role Physical and Role Emotional subscales had substantial floor and/or ceiling effects. Evidence did not support computing SF-36 Physical and Mental Component Summary scores. We propose guidelines that include the recommendation that these subscale and summary scores should be reported with caution. Copyright 2006 Movement Disorder Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17115394     DOI: 10.1002/mds.21187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mov Disord        ISSN: 0885-3185            Impact factor:   10.338


  2 in total

1.  Testing the SF-36 in Parkinson's disease. Implications for reporting rating scale data.

Authors:  P Hagell; A L Törnqvist; J Hobart
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  The cervical dystonia impact profile (CDIP-58): can a Rasch developed patient reported outcome measure satisfy traditional psychometric criteria?

Authors:  Stefan J Cano; Thomas T Warner; Alan J Thompson; Kailash P Bhatia; Ray Fitzpatrick; Jeremy C Hobart
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.186

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.