Literature DB >> 1711479

Evaluation of the carcinogenic potency of 4 environmental polycyclic aromatic compounds following intrapulmonary application in rats.

R Wenzel-Hartung1, H Brune, G Grimmer, P Germann, J Timm, W Wosniok.   

Abstract

The carcinogenic potential of 4 highly purified polycyclic aromatic compounds (PAC) was studied in the respiratory tract of rats. Using a beeswax/trioctanoin mixture as vehicle, 10, 3 and 1 mg phenanthrene (PHE), 3 and 1 mg chrysene (CHR), 0.1 mg dibenz(a,h)anthracene (DBahA) and 6, 3 and 1 mg benzo(b)naphto(2,1-d)thiophene (BNT) were injected into the lungs of 35 female Osborne-Mendel rats per group. Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP, 0.3, 0.1 and 0.03 mg) was used as the reference substance. Whereas only one squamous cell carcinoma developed at the highest PHE dose, a dose-dependent tumor incidence was found for CHR. BNT showed a carcinogenic effect similar to CHR, but an increasing incidence of neoplasms was not seen between the median and high dose. DBahA induced carcinomas in even more than half of the animals at the dose level of 0.1 mg and, therefore, has to be classified as the most potent PAC under investigation. BaP resulted in a clear dose-response relationship. According to probit analysis of the results, the carcinogenic potencies of the PAC relative to BaP (1.00) rank as follows: DBahA, 1.91; CHR, 0.03; BNT, 0.02; and PHE, 0.001. The estimated ED10- values were 0.031 mg for BaP, 0.016 mg for DBahA, 1.02 mg for CHR, 1.65 mg for BNT and 22.84 mg for PHE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1711479     DOI: 10.1016/s0232-1513(11)80302-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Pathol        ISSN: 0232-1513


  3 in total

1.  Comparative study of different exposure routes on the biotransformation and genotoxicity of PAHs in the flatfish species, Scophthalmus maximus.

Authors:  Marie Le Dû-Lacoste; Farida Akcha; Marie-Hélène Dévier; Bénédicte Morin; Thierry Burgeot; Hélène Budzinski
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Comparative transcriptomic analyses to scrutinize the assumption that genotoxic PAHs exert effects via a common mode of action.

Authors:  S Labib; A Williams; C H Guo; K Leingartner; V M Arlt; H H Schmeiser; C L Yauk; P A White; S Halappanavar
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Comparative analysis of contributions of wet deposition and photodegradation to the removal of atmospheric BaP by MFDCCA.

Authors:  Chunqiong Liu; Yuanyuan Guo; Kai Shi; Jiao Zhang; Bo Wu; Juan Du
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.