Literature DB >> 17114656

Phase II study of consolidation paclitaxel after concurrent chemoradiation in poor-risk stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: SWOG S9712.

Angela M Davies1, Kari Chansky, Derick H M Lau, Bryan R Leigh, Laurie E Gaspar, Geoffrey R Weiss, Antoinette J Wozniak, John J Crowley, David R Gandara.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A previous Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) study (S9429) demonstrated efficacy and tolerability of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in poor-risk stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study evaluated adding consolidation paclitaxel after chemoradiotherapy for a similar patient cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically/cytologically determined stage III NSCLC were eligible based on performance status (PS) 2 and either low albumin or weight loss more than 10%, poor pulmonary function, or comorbidities precluding cisplatin use. Treatment was carboplatin 200 mg/m2 days 1, 3, 29, and 31, and etoposide 50 mg/m2 days 1 through 4, and 29 to 32. Beginning day 1, thoracic radiation was delivered at 1.8 Gy in 25 fractions plus 16-Gy boost (total dose, 61 Gy). Patients without disease progression received paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 21 days for three cycles.
RESULTS: Characteristics of 87 eligible patients were age 51 to 82 years; 57% PS 0 to 1, 43% PS 2; and 51% stage IIIA, 49% stage IIIB. Toxicities of concurrent chemoradiotherapy included grade 3 esophagitis (7%) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (43%). Fifty-four assessable patients received paclitaxel consolidation. Four treatment-related deaths occurred during chemoradiotherapy and four occurred during consolidation. Overall response rate was 53%. Median progression free- and overall survival were 6.1 and 10.2 months, respectively. One- and 2-year survival rates were 43% and 25%.
CONCLUSION: Compared with a previous SWOG trial in a similar patient population, the addition of consolidation paclitaxel after chemoradiotherapy resulted in increased toxicity without a survival advantage. More PS 2 patients (43% v 18%) enrolled onto S9712, which may explain increased toxicity and lack of benefit. The optimal chemoradiotherapy approach for poor-risk patients remains to be defined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17114656     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.0268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  7 in total

Review 1.  The role of consolidation treatment in locally advanced unresectable NSCLC.

Authors:  Farhad Fakhrejahani; Nooshin Hashemi Sadraei; Tarek Mekhail
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  The effect of consolidation chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy on the survival of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xinshuai Wang; Xuezhen Ding; Dejiu Kong; Li Zhang; Yibo Guo; Jing Ren; Xiaochen Hu; Junqiang Yang; Shegan Gao
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  GEMSTONE-301: a phase III clinical trial of CS1001 as consolidation therapy in patients with locally advanced/unresectable (stage III) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who did not have disease progression after prior concurrent/sequential chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Qing Zhou; Ming Chen; Gang Wu; Jian-Hua Chang; Ou Jiang; Jiu-Wei Cui; Guang Han; Qin Lin; Jian Fang; Gong-Yan Chen; Yi-Long Wu
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2020-10

4.  Phase I study of induction chemotherapy and concomitant chemoradiotherapy with irinotecan, carboplatin, and paclitaxel for stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas W Choong; Everett E Vokes; Daniel J Haraf; Peter K Tothy; Mark K Ferguson; Kristen Kasza; Charles M Rudin; Philip C Hoffman; Stuart A Krauss; Livia Szeto; Ann M Mauer
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 15.609

5.  Efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in ECOG 2 patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a subgroup analysis of a randomized phase III trial.

Authors:  Nan Bi; Lipin Liu; Jun Liang; Shixiu Wu; Ming Chen; Changxing Lv; Lujun Zhao; Anhui Shi; Wei Jiang; Yaping Xu; Zongmei Zhou; Jingbo Wang; Wenqing Wang; Dongfu Chen; Zhouguang Hui; Jima Lv; Hongxing Zhang; Qinfu Feng; Zefen Xiao; Xin Wang; Tao Zhang; Weibo Yin; Junling Li; Jie He; Luhua Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Concurrent palliative chemoradiation leads to survival and quality of life benefits in poor prognosis stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised trial by the Norwegian Lung Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  H H Strøm; R M Bremnes; S H Sundstrøm; N Helbekkmo; O Fløtten; U Aasebø
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Consolidation chwemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs. chemoradiotherapy alone for locally advanced unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiu-Jun Chang; Zi-Tong Wang; Lei Yang
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.