Literature DB >> 17113427

Unintended pregnancy and use of emergency contraception among a large cohort of women attending for antenatal care or abortion in Scotland.

Fatim Lakha1, Anna Glasier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unintended pregnancy is common. Although many unintended pregnancies end in induced abortion, up to a third of those proceeding to birth might be unplanned. Some of these pregnancies could be prevented by emergency contraception. We have sought to establish how many pregnancies ending in either childbirth or abortion are unintended, and what proportion of women use emergency contraception to try to prevent pregnancy.
METHODS: 2908 women who attended an Edinburgh hospital for antenatal care and 907 attending for abortion fully completed a self-administered questionnaire including a validated measure of pregnancy intention and questions about emergency contraceptive use.
FINDINGS: 814 (89.7%) of 907 pregnancies among women requesting abortion were unintended compared with only 250 (8.6%) among 2908 women who planned to continue pregnancy. However, only 1909 (65.6%) of continuing pregnancies were intended. The rest of the women were ambivalent about pregnancy intention. In women who continued with their pregnancies intendedness was related to age, with unintended pregnancy most probable in young women (p<0.0001). Emergency contraception was used by 113 (11.8%) of women who requested abortion but only 40 (1%) of those planning to continue pregnancy. In those whose pregnancy was continuing, the proportions reporting use of emergency contraception were higher in young women than in older women and in those who reported that their pregnancies were unintended than in those who meant to become pregnant (both p<0.0001).
INTERPRETATION: Unintended pregnancy is common, even among women planning to continue pregnancy. However, EC use is low even among women with no intention of conceiving, and is thus unlikely to reduce unintended pregnancy rates. Rather, we need to find ways to improve the use of regular contraception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17113427     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69737-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  36 in total

1.  Emergency contraception: dispelling the myths and misperceptions.

Authors:  Elizabeth Westley; Anna Glasier
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Likelihood of emergency contraception use among African-American women at risk of adverse birth outcomes.

Authors:  Catherine E Lind; Emily M Godfrey; Kristin M Rankin; Arden S Handler
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-07

Review 3.  Intention to become pregnant and low birth weight and preterm birth: a systematic review.

Authors:  Prakesh S Shah; Taiba Balkhair; Arne Ohlsson; Joseph Beyene; Fran Scott; Corine Frick
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-02

Review 4.  Emergency contraception. Widely available and effective but disappointing as a public health intervention: a review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Unintended pregnancies in England in 2010: costs to the National Health Service (NHS).

Authors:  Calypso Montouchet; James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Unplanned pregnancy and contraceptive use in Hull and East Yorkshire.

Authors:  Helen Bexhell; Kate Guthrie; Kelly Cleland; James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Measuring pregnancy planning: An assessment of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among urban, south Indian women.

Authors:  Corinne H Rocca; Suneeta Krishnan; Geraldine Barrett; Mark Wilson
Journal:  Demogr Res       Date:  2010-08-06

8.  Emergency contraception for newly arrested women: evidence for an unrecognized public health opportunity.

Authors:  Carolyn B Sufrin; Jacqueline P Tulsky; Joseph Goldenson; Kelly S Winter; Deborah L Cohan
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 9.  Multiple Unintended Pregnancies in U.S. Women: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  E Angel Aztlan-James; Monica McLemore; Diana Taylor
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2017-03-09

10.  High rate of unintended pregnancy among pregnant women in a maternity hospital in Córdoba, Argentina: a pilot study.

Authors:  Celina Palena; M Valeria Bahamondes; Verónica Schenk; Luis Bahamondes; Julio Fernandez-Funes
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.