Literature DB >> 17112986

Contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of right ventricular infarction.

Andreas Kumar1, Hassan Abdel-Aty, Ilka Kriedemann, Jeanette Schulz-Menger, C Michael Gross, Rainer Dietz, Matthias G Friedrich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the role of late enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (LE-CMR) for the diagnosis of right ventricular infarction (RVI).
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular infarction occurs in about one-half of patients with inferior myocardial infarction (MI). It is associated with an unfavorable prognosis, but established methods often lack the diagnostic accuracy to detect it. Late enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging accurately detects left ventricular MI.
METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with acute inferior MI were included. To test for RVI, they prospectively underwent a physical examination, an electrocardiogram (ECG) for ST-segment elevation in the V4r right precordial lead, and an echocardiogram. After coronary reperfusion, LE-CMR was performed for assessing presence and extent of late enhancement in the right ventricular (RV) wall. The LE-CMR data were compared with the other results; interobserver variability was assessed. The LE-CMR was repeated after 13 months.
RESULTS: Late enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging detected RVI in 21 of 37 (57%) patients with acute inferior MI. Interobserver variability was very good (kappa 0.83); physical exam was positive for RVI in 7 of 37 (19%) patients, V4r ECG in 13 of 37 (35%) patients, and echocardiogram in 6 of 37 (16%) patients. The LE-CMR findings for RVI showed only mild agreement with findings for RVI on physical exam (kappa 0.30), V(4)r ECG (kappa 0.38), and echocardiography (kappa 0.32). Irreversible injury of the RV persisted at 13 months (kappa 0.85).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute inferior MI, RVI is more frequently detected by LE-CMR than by current standard diagnostic techniques. Further CMR studies might allow for analyzing its clinical and prognostic relevance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17112986     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  24 in total

1.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  The cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) approach to assessing myocardial viability.

Authors:  Andrew E Arai
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Echocardiographic assessment of global longitudinal right ventricular function in patients with an acute inferior ST elevation myocardial infarction and proximal right coronary artery occlusion.

Authors:  Martin Hutyra; Tomáš Skála; David Horák; Martin Köcher; Zbyněk Tüdös; Jana Zapletalová; Jan Přeček; Albert Louis; Aleš Smékal; Miloš Táborský
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Right ventricular dysfunction: an independent and incremental predictor of cardiac deaths late after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gianluca Di Bella; Valeria Siciliano; Giovanni D Aquaro; Daniele De Marchi; Daniele Rovai; Scipione Carerj; Sabrina Molinaro; Massimo Lombardi; Alessandro Pingitore
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Multimodality imaging of the ischemic right ventricle: an overview and proposal of a diagnostic algorithm.

Authors:  A Malagoli; A Albini; G E Mandoli; A Baggiano; G Vinco; F Bandera; A D'Andrea; R Esposito; F D'Ascenzi; R Sorrentino; C Santoro; G Benfari; F Contorni; M Cameli
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Utility of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in the evaluation of right ventricular (RV) involvement in patients with myocardial infarction (MI).

Authors:  Nicola Galea; Marco Francone; Iacopo Carbone; David Cannata; Francesco Vullo; Roberto Galea; Luciano Agati; Francesco Fedele; Carlo Catalano
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 8.  The use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Hassan Abdel-Aty; Christoph Tillmanns
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Post myocardial infarction of the left ventricle: the course ahead seen by cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Pier Giorgio Masci; Jan Bogaert
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-06

Review 10.  Cardiac MR imaging: current status and future direction.

Authors:  Maythem Saeed; Tu Anh Van; Roland Krug; Steven W Hetts; Mark W Wilson
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2015-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.