Literature DB >> 17112430

A survey of partner notification practices among general practitioners and their use of an internet resource for partner notification for Chlamydia trachomatis.

Jane E Tomnay1, Rachelle L Gebert, Christopher K Fairley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine in which circumstances Victorian general practitioners (GPs) offer chlamydia testing to patients, the attitudes of GPs in relation to contact tracing, how often GPs use a pre-printed partner letter and patient brochure and what proportion of GPs have immediate internet access in their consulting rooms.
METHODS: This study involved two parts, an initial survey of a sample of GPs in Victoria and a study of GP use of a website that provided treatment guidelines, a printable client brochure and a partner letter.
RESULTS: Of 418 eligible GPs, 221 (53%, 48-58%, 95% CI) returned completed surveys. Of these, 213 (97%, 93-99%, 95% CI) GPs believed that patients were largely responsible for notifying partners. Partner letters were rarely used: 167 (76%, 70-81%, 95% CI) GPs reported they never used partner letters, 18 (8%, 5-13%, 95% CI) GPs reported rare use and 23 (10%, 7-15%, 95% CI) GPs reportedusing them sometimes. Of the GPs, 181 (82%, 77-87%, 95% CI) reported they would find a partner letter and patient brochure on a website helpful. During the study, the website was accessed by 28 GPs (25%, 17-34%, 95% CI) in Gippsland and 17 GPs (8%, 5-13%, 95% CI) in Geelong who received positive chlamydia results on 110 and 208 clients respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: GPs mostly considered patients responsible for partner notification but uncommonly used partner letters or an information brochure to assist them. Importantly, GPs reported that they could improve partner notification if further support was provided. In addition, when a website was provided with useful documents on it, up to 25% of GPs used it. This indicates that simple and inexpensive interventions can support GPs with strategies that may improve the control of chlamydia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17112430     DOI: 10.1071/sh05052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Health        ISSN: 1448-5028            Impact factor:   2.706


  3 in total

1.  Better than nothing? Patient-delivered partner therapy and partner notification for chlamydia: the views of Australian general practitioners.

Authors:  Natasha L Pavlin; Rhian M Parker; Anna K Piggin; Carol A Hopkins; Meredith J Temple-Smith; Christopher K Fairley; Jane E Tomnay; Francis J Bowden; Darren B Russell; Jane S Hocking; Marian K Pitts; Marcus Y Chen
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 3.090

2.  Traditional and Web-Based Technologies to Improve Partner Notification Following Syphilis Diagnosis Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Lima, Peru: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jesse L Clark; Eddy R Segura; Catherine E Oldenburg; Hector J Salvatierra; Jessica Rios; Amaya Gabriela Perez-Brumer; Pedro Gonzales; Bhupendra Sheoran; Jorge Sanchez; Javier R Lama
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  What needs to change to increase chlamydia screening in general practice in Australia? The views of general practitioners.

Authors:  Jane S Hocking; Rhian M Parker; Natasha Pavlin; Christopher K Fairley; Jane M Gunn
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 3.295

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.