Literature DB >> 17111555

Reproductive freedom, self-regulation, and the government of impairment in utero.

Shelley Tremain.   

Abstract

This article critically examines the constitution of impairment in prenatal testing and screening practices and various discourses that surround these technologies. While technologies to test and screen (for impairment) prenatally are claimed to enhance women's capacity to be self-determining, make informed reproductive choices, and, in effect, wrest control of their bodies from a patriarchal medical establishment, I contend that this emerging relation between pregnant women and reproductive technologies is a new strategy of a form of power that began to emerge in the late eighteenth century. Indeed, my argument is that the constitution of prenatal impairment, by and through these practices and procedures, is a widening form of modern government that increasingly limits the field of possible conduct in response to pregnancy. Hence, the government of impairment in utero is inextricably intertwined with the government of the maternal body.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17111555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypatia        ISSN: 0887-5367


  4 in total

1.  Assessing security technology's impact: old tools for new problems.

Authors:  Reinhard Kreissl
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and pregnant women's views on good motherhood: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Elisa Garcia; Lidewij Henneman; Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal; Linda Martin; Isabel Koopmanschap; Mireille N Bekker; Danielle R M Timmermans
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 5.351

3.  Swedish parents' interest in preconception genetic carrier screening.

Authors:  Maria Ekstrand Ragnar; Tanja Tydén; Ulrik Kihlbom; Margareta Larsson
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.384

4.  Ethical issues in preconception genetic carrier screening.

Authors:  Ulrik Kihlbom
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.384

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.