Literature DB >> 17111469

Dose-response study of spinal hyperbaric ropivacaine for cesarean section.

Xin-zhong Chen1, Hong Chen, Ai-fei Lou, Chang-cheng Lü.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal hyperbaric ropivacaine may produce more predictable and reliable anesthesia than plain ropivacaine for cesarean section. The dose-response relation for spinal hyperbaric ropivacaine is undetermined. This double-blind, randomized, dose-response study determined the ED50 (50% effective dose) and ED95 (95% effective dose) of spinal hyperbaric ropivacaine for cesarean section anesthesia.
METHODS: Sixty parturients undergoing elective cesarean section delivery with use of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled in this study. An epidural catheter was placed at the L1 approximately L2 vertebral interspace, then lumbar puncture was performed at the L3 approximately L4 vertebral interspace, and parturients were randomized to receive spinal hyperbaric ropivacaine in doses of 10.5 mg, 12 mg, 13.5 mg, or 15 mg in equal volumes of 3 ml. Sensory levels (pinprick) were assessed every 2.5 min until a T7 level was achieved and motor changes were assessed by modified Bromage Score. A dose was considered effective if an upper sensory level to pin prick of T7 or above was achieved and no intraoperative epidural supplement was required. ED50 and ED95 were determined with use of a logistic regression model.
RESULTS: ED50 (95% confidence interval) of spinal hyperbaric ropivacaine was determined to be 10.37 (5.23 approximately 11.59) mg and ED95 (95% confidence interval) to be 15.39 (13.81approximately 23.59) mg. The maximum sensory block levels and the duration of motor block and the rate of hypotension, but not onset of anesthesia, were significantly related to the ropivacaine dose.
CONCLUSION: The ED50 and ED95 of spinal hyperbaric ropivacaine for cesarean delivery under the conditions of this study were 10.37 mg and 15.39 mg, respectively. Ropivacaine is suitable for spinal anesthesia in cesarean delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17111469      PMCID: PMC1661673          DOI: 10.1631/jzus.2006.B0992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B        ISSN: 1673-1581            Impact factor:   3.066


  16 in total

1.  Spinal anaesthesia with ropivacaine 5 mg ml(-1) in glucose 10 mg ml(-1) or 50 mg ml(-1).

Authors:  J B Whiteside; D Burke; J A Wildsmith
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Low-dose bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Authors:  B Ben-David; G Miller; R Gavriel; A Gurevitch
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.288

Review 3.  Intrathecal levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for cesarean section. New perspectives.

Authors:  D Celleno; R Parpaglioni; M G Frigo; G Barbati
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Intrathecal drug spread.

Authors:  C Connolly; J A Wildsmith
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Plain bupivacaine: an unpredictable spinal anaesthetic agent.

Authors:  M R Logan; J H McClure; J A Wildsmith
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Spinal ropivacaine for cesarean section: a dose-finding study.

Authors:  K S Khaw; W D Ngan Kee; E L Wong; J Y Liu; R Chung
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Spinal ropivacaine for cesarean delivery: a comparison of hyperbaric and plain solutions.

Authors:  Kim S Khaw; Warwick D Ngan Kee; Mabel Wong; Floria Ng; Anna Lee
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Comparison of plain and hyperbaric solutions of ropivacaine for spinal anaesthesia.

Authors:  P D W Fettes; G Hocking; M K Peterson; J F Luck; J A W Wildsmith
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-10-29       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Comparison of the effects of intrathecal ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, and bupivacaine for Caesarean section.

Authors:  P Gautier; M De Kock; L Huberty; T Demir; M Izydorczic; B Vanderick
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Incidence of visceral pain during cesarean section: the effect of varying doses of spinal bupivacaine.

Authors:  H Pedersen; A C Santos; E S Steinberg; H M Schapiro; T W Harmon; M Finster
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  7 in total

1.  Norepinephrine intravenous prophylactic bolus versus rescue bolus to prevent and treat maternal hypotension after combined spinal and epidural anesthesia during cesarean delivery: a sequential dose-finding study.

Authors:  Tao Xu; Jing Zheng; Xiao-Hu An; Zi-Feng Xu; Fang Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

2.  ED 50 and ED 95 of intrathecal bupivacaine coadministered with sufentanil for cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural in severely preeclamptic patients.

Authors:  Fei Xiao; Wen-Ping Xu; Xiao-Min Zhang; Yin-Fa Zhang; Li-Zhong Wang; Xin-Zhong Chen
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  ED50 and ED95 of intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine for parturients undergoing cesarean section with prophylactic infusion of phenylephrine: A Prospective dose-finding Study.

Authors:  Wenping Xu; Fei Xiao; Yinfa Zhang; Lin Liu; Xiangyang Chang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Prevention of hypotension and prolongation of postoperative analgesia in emergency cesarean sections: A randomized study with intrathecal clonidine.

Authors:  Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa; Sukhwinder Kaur Bajwa; Jasbir Kaur; Amarjit Singh; Anita Singh; Surjit Singh Parmar
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2012-05

Review 5.  Update on the clinical utility and practical use of ropivacaine in Chinese patients.

Authors:  Man Li; Li Wan; Wei Mei; Yuke Tian
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 4.162

6.  The Dose-response of Intrathecal Ropivacaine Co-administered with Sufentanil for Cesarean Delivery under Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia in Patients with Scarred Uterus.

Authors:  Fei Xiao; Wen-Ping Xu; Yin-Fa Zhang; Lin Liu; Xia Liu; Li-Zhong Wang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  A randomised dose-response study of prophylactic Methoxamine infusion for preventing spinal-induced hypotension during Cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Feng Fu; Yu-Wen Tang; Hong Chen; Cui-Cui Jiao; Na Ma; Xin-Zhong Chen
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.217

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.