Literature DB >> 17111358

Neural specialization for hovering in hummingbirds: hypertrophy of the pretectal nucleus Lentiformis mesencephali.

Andrew N Iwaniuk1, Douglas R W Wylie.   

Abstract

Hummingbirds possess an array of morphological and physiological specializations that allow them hover such that they maintain a stable position in space for extended periods. Among birds, this sustained hovering is unique to hummingbirds, but possible neural specializations underlying this behavior have not been investigated. The optokinetic response (OKR) is one of several behaviors that facilitates stabilization. In birds, the OKR is generated by the nucleus of the basal optic root (nBOR) and pretectal nucleus lentiformis mesencephali (LM). Because stabilization during hovering is dependent on the OKR, we predicted that nBOR and LM would be significantly enlarged in hummingbirds. We examined the relative size of nBOR, LM, and other visual nuclei of 37 species of birds from 13 orders, including nine hummingbird species. Also included were three species that hover for short periods of time (transient hoverers; a kingfisher, a kestrel, and a nectarivorous songbird). Our results demonstrate that, relative to brain volume, LM is significantly hypertrophied in hummingbirds compared with other birds. In the transient hoverers, there is a moderate enlargement of the LM, but not to the extent found in the hummingbirds. The same degree of hypertrophy is not, however, present in nBOR or the other visual nuclei measured: nucleus geniculatus lateralis, pars ventralis, and optic tectum. This selective hypertrophy of LM and not other visual nuclei suggests that the direction-selective optokinetic neurons in LM are critical for sustained hovering flight because of their prominent role in the OKR and gaze stabilization. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17111358     DOI: 10.1002/cne.21098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  20 in total

1.  Motor pathway convergence predicts syllable repertoire size in oscine birds.

Authors:  Jordan M Moore; Tamás Székely; József Büki; Timothy J Devoogd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Hummingbirds control hovering flight by stabilizing visual motion.

Authors:  Benjamin Goller; Douglas L Altshuler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Concerted and mosaic evolution of functional modules in songbird brains.

Authors:  Jordan M Moore; Timothy J DeVoogd
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Comparative analysis of vestibular ecomorphology in birds.

Authors:  Roger B J Benson; Ethan Starmer-Jones; Roger A Close; Stig A Walsh
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Limitations of rotational manoeuvrability in insects and hummingbirds: evaluating the effects of neuro-biomechanical delays and muscle mechanical power.

Authors:  Pan Liu; Bo Cheng
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Hummingbirds have a greatly enlarged hippocampal formation.

Authors:  Brian J Ward; Lainy B Day; Steven R Wilkening; Douglas R Wylie; Deborah M Saucier; Andrew N Iwaniuk
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Brain reorganization, not relative brain size, primarily characterizes anthropoid brain evolution.

Authors:  J B Smaers; C Soligo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Avian cerebellar floccular fossa size is not a proxy for flying ability in birds.

Authors:  Stig A Walsh; Andrew N Iwaniuk; Monja A Knoll; Estelle Bourdon; Paul M Barrett; Angela C Milner; Robert L Nudds; Richard L Abel; Patricia Dello Sterpaio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Anatomical specializations for nocturnality in a critically endangered parrot, the Kakapo (Strigops habroptilus).

Authors:  Jeremy R Corfield; Anna C Gsell; Dianne Brunton; Christopher P Heesy; Margaret I Hall; Monica L Acosta; Andrew N Iwaniuk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Can social behaviour drive accessory olfactory bulb asymmetries? Sister species of caviomorph rodents as a case in point.

Authors:  Pedro Fernández-Aburto; Scarlett E Delgado; Raúl Sobrero; Jorge Mpodozis
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.