OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictive performance for 1-yr mortality of the previously derived and validated Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PATIENTS: Consecutive adult (aged > or =18 yrs) emergency department patients presenting to an urban, tertiary care, university hospital were eligible if they had a clinically suspected infection as indicated by the decision to obtain a blood culture. The enrollment period was between February 1, 2000, and February 1, 2001. Of 3,926 eligible patient visits, 3,762 (96%) were enrolled and 3,102 unique first visits were analyzed. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 667 patients (21.5%) died within 1 yr. The unadjusted 1-yr mortality rates for the MEDS risk groups were: very low risk, 7%; low risk, 20%; moderate risk, 37%; high risk, 64%; very high risk, 80%. Using a Cox proportional hazard model that controlled for age, sex, and Charlson co-morbidity index, the 1-yr hazard ratios compared with the baseline very low-risk group were: low risk, 2.2 (1.7-2.9); moderate risk, 3.5 (2.7-4.6); high risk, 6.7 (4.9-9.3); and very high risk, 10.5 (7.2-15.4). The groups were significantly different (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the score was initially derived for 28-day in-hospital mortality, our results indicate that the MEDS score also predicts patient survival at 1 yr after index hospital visit with suspected infection. The score needs external validation before widespread use.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictive performance for 1-yr mortality of the previously derived and validated Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PATIENTS: Consecutive adult (aged > or =18 yrs) emergency department patients presenting to an urban, tertiary care, university hospital were eligible if they had a clinically suspected infection as indicated by the decision to obtain a blood culture. The enrollment period was between February 1, 2000, and February 1, 2001. Of 3,926 eligible patient visits, 3,762 (96%) were enrolled and 3,102 unique first visits were analyzed. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 667 patients (21.5%) died within 1 yr. The unadjusted 1-yr mortality rates for the MEDS risk groups were: very low risk, 7%; low risk, 20%; moderate risk, 37%; high risk, 64%; very high risk, 80%. Using a Cox proportional hazard model that controlled for age, sex, and Charlson co-morbidity index, the 1-yr hazard ratios compared with the baseline very low-risk group were: low risk, 2.2 (1.7-2.9); moderate risk, 3.5 (2.7-4.6); high risk, 6.7 (4.9-9.3); and very high risk, 10.5 (7.2-15.4). The groups were significantly different (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the score was initially derived for 28-day in-hospital mortality, our results indicate that the MEDS score also predicts patient survival at 1 yr after index hospital visit with suspected infection. The score needs external validation before widespread use.
Authors: Richard Ssekitoleko; Relana Pinkerton; Rose Muhindo; Sanjay Bhagani; Christopher C Moore Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Matthew M Churpek; Frank J Zadravecz; Christopher Winslow; Michael D Howell; Dana P Edelson Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Ithan D Peltan; Samuel M Brown; Joseph R Bledsoe; Jeffrey Sorensen; Matthew H Samore; Todd L Allen; Catherine L Hough Journal: Chest Date: 2019-02-16 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Eren Gultepe; Jeffrey P Green; Hien Nguyen; Jason Adams; Timothy Albertson; Ilias Tagkopoulos Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-08-19 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Philipp Schuetz; Alan E Jones; Michael D Howell; Stephen Trzeciak; Long Ngo; John G Younger; William Aird; Nathan I Shapiro Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2011-06-16 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Felicitas Geier; Steffen Popp; Yvonne Greve; Andreas Achterberg; Erika Glöckner; Renate Ziegler; Hans Jürgen Heppner; Harald Mang; Michael Christ Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2013-08-10 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Marc Kowalkowski; Tara Eaton; Andrew McWilliams; Hazel Tapp; Aleta Rios; Stephanie Murphy; Ryan Burns; Bella Gutnik; Katherine O'Hare; Lewis McCurdy; Michael Dulin; Christopher Blanchette; Shih-Hsiung Chou; Scott Halpern; Derek C Angus; Stephanie P Taylor Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 2.655