Literature DB >> 17110681

Low-field MR imaging of meningiomas including dynamic contrast enhancement study: evaluation of surgical and histopathologic characteristics.

S K Yrjänä1, H Tuominen, A Karttunen, N Lähdesluoma, E Heikkinen, J Koivukangas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Risks associated with surgery of meningiomas, especially those located in the skull base, are influenced by tumor consistency and vascularity. The purpose of this study was to find out if vascularity, consistency, and histologic characteristics of meningioma can be predicted preoperatively by using low-field MR imaging, including dynamic imaging of contrast enhancement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients (mean age, 56; range, 34-73 years; 16 women, 5 men) with meningioma requiring first surgery were imaged by a 0.23T scanner. Time to maximum enhancement, maximum enhancement, and maximum intensity increase were noted from the enhancement curve of dynamic imaging. Relative intensity of tumor in fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and T2-weighted images was calculated. The neurosurgeon evaluated surgical bleeding and hardness of tumor on a visual analog scale. Histopathologic analysis included subtype, World Health Organization grade, mitotic activity, grades of progesterone receptor expression and collagen content, proliferation activity by Ki-67 (MIB-1), and microvessel density by CD34. Correlations were studied with Kendall tau statistics.
RESULTS: The most powerful association was found between time to maximum enhancement and microvessel density (tau = -0.60, P < .001). Surgical bleeding (tau = 0.49, P = .002), blood loss during surgery (tau = 0.49, P = .002), progesterone receptor expression (tau = 0.59, P < .001), and collagen content (tau = -0.54, P < .001) were statistically best correlated with the relative intensity of meningioma on FLAIR images. Tissue hardness correlated best with relative intensity on T2-weighted images (tau = 0.40, P = .012).
CONCLUSION: Assessment of microvessel density, collagen content, and progesterone receptor expression of meningioma may be clinically feasible by using low-field MR imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17110681      PMCID: PMC7977226     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  25 in total

1.  Segmented k-space and real-time cardiac cine MR imaging with radial trajectories.

Authors:  A Shankaranarayanan; O P Simonetti; G Laub; J S Lewin; J L Duerk
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Dynamic MR imaging of brain tumors in low field using undersampled projection reconstruction.

Authors:  Sanna K Yrjänä; Teuvo Vaara; Ari Karttunen; Jani Katisko; John Koivukangas
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Prediction of consistency of meningiomas with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  N Yamaguchi; T Kawase; M Sagoh; T Ohira; H Shiga; S Toya
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1997-12

4.  Experience in surgical management of tumours involving the cavernous sinus.

Authors:  Y K Tu; M Y Tseng; H M Liu
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.961

5.  Dynamic MRI of meningiomas and schwannomas: is differential diagnosis possible?

Authors:  I Ikushima; Y Korogi; J Kuratsu; T Hirai; S Hamatake; M Takahashi; Y Ushio
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Pterional surgery of meningiomas of the tuberculum sellae and planum sphenoidale: surgical results with special consideration of ophthalmological and endocrinological outcomes.

Authors:  Rudolf Fahlbusch; Werner Schott
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  MRI of intracranial meningiomas: correlations with histology and physical consistency.

Authors:  P Carpeggiani; G Crisi; C Trevisan
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Differential diagnosis of extra-axial intracranial tumours by dynamic spin-echo MRI.

Authors:  Y G Joo; Y Korogi; T Hirai; Y Sakamoto; M Sumi; M Takahashi; Y Ushio
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Dynamic contrast enhancement of intracranial tumors with snapshot-FLASH MR imaging.

Authors:  T Nägele; D Petersen; U Klose; W Grodd; H Opitz; E Gut; J Martos; K Voigt
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  [Assessment of hemodynamics of meningioma with dynamic MR imaging].

Authors:  Yoshihisa Oka; Katsusuke Kusunoki; Ichiro Nochide; Keiji Igase; Hironobu Harada; Kazuhiko Sadamoto; Kiyoshi Nagasawa
Journal:  No To Shinkei       Date:  2002-07
View more
  11 in total

1.  Accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging-magnetic resonance in differentiating functional from non-functional pituitary macro-adenoma and classification of tumor consistency.

Authors:  Morteza Sanei Taheri; Farnaz Kimia; Mersad Mehrnahad; Hamidreza Saligheh Rad; Hamidreza Haghighatkhah; Afshin Moradi; Anahita Fathi Kazerooni; Mohammadreza Alviri; Abdorrahim Absalan
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2018-12-03

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance elastography: a general overview of its current and future applications in brain imaging.

Authors:  Antonio Di Ieva; Fabio Grizzi; Elisa Rognone; Zion Tsz Ho Tse; Tassanai Parittotokkaporn; Ferdinando Rodriguez Y Baena; Manfred Tschabitscher; Christian Matula; Siegfrid Trattnig; Riccardo Rodriguez Y Baena
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  Predicting Meningioma Consistency on Preoperative Neuroimaging Studies.

Authors:  Mark S Shiroishi; Steven Y Cen; Benita Tamrazi; Francesco D'Amore; Alexander Lerner; Kevin S King; Paul E Kim; Meng Law; Darryl H Hwang; Orest B Boyko; Chia-Shang J Liu
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 4.  Imaging biomarkers of angiogenesis and the microvascular environment in cerebral tumours.

Authors:  G Thompson; S J Mills; D J Coope; J P B O'Connor; A Jackson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Can MRI predict meningioma consistency?: a correlation with tumor pathology and systematic review.

Authors:  Amy Yao; Margaret Pain; Priti Balchandani; Raj K Shrivastava
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Use of preoperative MRI to predict vestibular schwannoma intraoperative consistency and facial nerve outcome.

Authors:  William R Copeland; Jason M Hoover; Jonathan M Morris; Colin L W Driscoll; Michael J Link
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2013-05-22

Review 7.  Utility of preoperative meningioma consistency measurement with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE): a review.

Authors:  Alexander G Chartrain; Mehmet Kurt; Amy Yao; Rui Feng; Kambiz Nael; J Mocco; Joshua B Bederson; Priti Balchandani; Raj K Shrivastava
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Predicting Consistency of Meningioma by Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Kyle A Smith; John D Leever; Roukoz B Chamoun
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2015-01-21

9.  Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging T1 and T2 sequences to determine intraoperative meningioma consistency.

Authors:  Jason M Hoover; Jonathan M Morris; Fredric B Meyer
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-10-12

10.  Meningioma Consistency: Correlation Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics, Operative Findings, and Histopathological Features.

Authors:  Mahmoud Alyamany; Mohammad M Alshardan; Abdullah Abu Jamea; Nahid ElBakry; Lahbib Soualmi; Yasser Orz
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.