E I Levy1, E Sauvageau, R A Hanel, R Parikh, L N Hopkins. 1. Department of Neurosurgery and Toshiba Stroke Research Center, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14209, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Despite advances in mechanical thrombolysis for acute stroke, recanalization rates remain approximately 50%-60%. Technologic improvements allowed safe intracranial delivery of stents. To study the feasibility of stent-assisted recanalization for acute stroke, we deployed self-expanding or balloon-mounted stents in 2- to 3.5-mm canine vessels acutely occluded with clot emboli. METHODS: Six mongrel dogs were placed under general anesthesia. A guiding catheter was placed in the distal vertebral artery or an external carotid artery branch. A 7 x 3 mm (length x diameter) soft or hard clot was injected into the catheter and allowed to embolize distally; 20 vessels were successfully occluded. After systemic heparin anticoagulation, recanalization with a self-expanding stent was attempted in 11 vessels (5 occluded with soft clot; 6, with hard clot). Balloon-mounted stents were placed in an attempt to revascularize 9 vessels (4 occluded with soft clot; 5, with hard clot). Vessel recanalization was assessed as the primary end point. Side-branch occlusion and stent-induced vasospasm were also assessed. RESULTS: Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction/Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction flow for 11 vessels treated with self-expanding stents versus 9 treated with balloon-mounted stents was as follows: grade 3, 91% of vessels versus 78% of vessels; grade 2, 0% versus 11%; grade 1, 9% versus 0%; grade 0, 0% versus 11%. Lower rates of spasm and side-branch occlusion were noticed with self-expanding stents. Grade 2/3 flow was achieved in 18/20 vessels (90%). CONCLUSIONS: Excellent recanalization was demonstrated with both stents. Recanalization in self-expanding stents was achieved without pre- or post-balloon dilation. Stents may prove to be a useful adjunct for intra-arterial acute stroke treatment.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Despite advances in mechanical thrombolysis for acute stroke, recanalization rates remain approximately 50%-60%. Technologic improvements allowed safe intracranial delivery of stents. To study the feasibility of stent-assisted recanalization for acute stroke, we deployed self-expanding or balloon-mounted stents in 2- to 3.5-mm canine vessels acutely occluded with clot emboli. METHODS: Six mongrel dogs were placed under general anesthesia. A guiding catheter was placed in the distal vertebral artery or an external carotid artery branch. A 7 x 3 mm (length x diameter) soft or hard clot was injected into the catheter and allowed to embolize distally; 20 vessels were successfully occluded. After systemic heparin anticoagulation, recanalization with a self-expanding stent was attempted in 11 vessels (5 occluded with soft clot; 6, with hard clot). Balloon-mounted stents were placed in an attempt to revascularize 9 vessels (4 occluded with soft clot; 5, with hard clot). Vessel recanalization was assessed as the primary end point. Side-branch occlusion and stent-induced vasospasm were also assessed. RESULTS:Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction/Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction flow for 11 vessels treated with self-expanding stents versus 9 treated with balloon-mounted stents was as follows: grade 3, 91% of vessels versus 78% of vessels; grade 2, 0% versus 11%; grade 1, 9% versus 0%; grade 0, 0% versus 11%. Lower rates of spasm and side-branch occlusion were noticed with self-expanding stents. Grade 2/3 flow was achieved in 18/20 vessels (90%). CONCLUSIONS: Excellent recanalization was demonstrated with both stents. Recanalization in self-expanding stents was achieved without pre- or post-balloon dilation. Stents may prove to be a useful adjunct for intra-arterial acute stroke treatment.
Authors: Randall Higashida; Anthony Furlan; Heidi Roberts; Thomas Tomsick; Buddy Connors; John Barr; William Dillon; Steven Warach; Joseph Broderick; Barbara Tilley; David Sacks Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Jay U Howington; Ricardo A Hanel; Mark R Harrigan; Elad I Levy; Lee R Guterman; L Nelson Hopkins Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Elad I Levy; Michael J Rinaldi; Jay U Howington; Bernard R Bendok; Stanley H Kim; Mark R Harrigan; Adnan I Qureshi; Lee R Guterman; Nelson Hopkins Journal: J Invasive Cardiol Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 2.022
Authors: C L Grines; D A Cox; G W Stone; E Garcia; L A Mattos; A Giambartolomei; B R Brodie; O Madonna; M Eijgelshoven; A J Lansky; W W O'Neill; M C Morice Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-12-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Y Pierre Gobin; Sidney Starkman; Gary R Duckwiler; Thomas Grobelny; Chelsea S Kidwell; Reza Jahan; John Pile-Spellman; Alan Segal; Fernando Vinuela; Jeffrey L Saver Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-10-28 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Elad I Levy; Robert D Ecker; Ricardo A Hanel; Eric Sauvageau; J Christopher Wehman; Lee R Guterman; L Nelson Hopkins Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: J Gralla; M Burkhardt; G Schroth; M El-Koussy; M Reinert; K Nedeltchev; J Slotboom; C Brekenfeld Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-11-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Vivien H Lee; Susan Samuels; Thomas J Herbst; Marlene Gallegos; Elizabeth J Cochran; Michael Chen; Shyam Prabhakaran; Demetrius K Lopes Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: P T L Chiam; R M Samuelson; J Mocco; R A Hanel; A H Siddiqui; L N Hopkins; E I Levy Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2008-09-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Andrea M Herrmann; Stephan Meckel; Matthew J Gounis; Leona Kringe; Edith Motschall; Christoph Mülling; Johannes Boltze Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: E I Levy; R Mehta; R Gupta; R A Hanel; A J Chamczuk; D Fiorella; H H Woo; F C Albuquerque; T G Jovin; M B Horowitz; L N Hopkins Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: S H Suh; B M Kim; H G Roh; K-Y Lee; S I Park; D I Kim; D J Kim; H S Nam; H S Choi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-11-05 Impact factor: 3.825