MOTIVATION: The only algorithm guaranteed to find the optimal local alignment is the Smith-Waterman. It is also one of the slowest due to the number of computations required for the search. To speed up the algorithm, Single-Instruction Multiple-Data (SIMD) instructions have been used to parallelize the algorithm at the instruction level. RESULTS: A faster implementation of the Smith-Waterman algorithm is presented. This algorithm achieved 2-8 times performance improvement over other SIMD based Smith-Waterman implementations. On a 2.0 GHz Xeon Core 2 Duo processor, speeds of >3.0 billion cell updates/s were achieved. AVAILABILITY: http://farrar.michael.googlepages.com/Smith-waterman
MOTIVATION: The only algorithm guaranteed to find the optimal local alignment is the Smith-Waterman. It is also one of the slowest due to the number of computations required for the search. To speed up the algorithm, Single-Instruction Multiple-Data (SIMD) instructions have been used to parallelize the algorithm at the instruction level. RESULTS: A faster implementation of the Smith-Waterman algorithm is presented. This algorithm achieved 2-8 times performance improvement over other SIMD based Smith-Waterman implementations. On a 2.0 GHz Xeon Core 2 Duo processor, speeds of >3.0 billion cell updates/s were achieved. AVAILABILITY: http://farrar.michael.googlepages.com/Smith-waterman