Literature DB >> 17109330

Integration without unification: an argument for pluralism in the biological sciences.

Sandra D Mitchell1, Michael R Dietrich.   

Abstract

In this article, we consider the tension between unification and pluralism in biological theory. We begin with a consideration of historical efforts to establish a unified understanding of evolution in the neo-Darwinian synthesis. The fragmentation of the evolutionary synthesis by molecular evolution suggests the limitations of the general unificationist ideal for biology but not necessarily for integrating explanations. In the second half of this article, we defend a specific variety of pluralism that allows for the integration required for explanations of complex phenomena without unification on a large scale.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17109330     DOI: 10.1086/509050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  4 in total

1.  Explanatory pluralism in the medical sciences: theory and practice.

Authors:  Leen De Vreese; Erik Weber; Jeroen Van Bouwel
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2010-10

Review 2.  Using network models in person-centered care in psychiatry: How perspectivism could help to draw boundaries.

Authors:  Nina S de Boer; Daniel Kostić; Marcos Ross; Leon de Bruin; Gerrit Glas
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 5.435

Review 3.  Stoichiometry and the new biology: the future is now.

Authors:  James J Elser; Andrew Hamilton
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  The neurosciences and the search for a unified psychology: the science and esthetics of a single framework.

Authors:  Henderikus J Stam
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.