Literature DB >> 17108894

Evaluation of the recursive model approach for estimating particulate matter infiltration efficiencies using continuous light scattering data.

Ryan Allen1, Lance Wallace, Timothy Larson, Lianne Sheppard, Lee-Jane Sally Liu.   

Abstract

Quantifying particulate matter (PM) infiltration efficiencies (F(inf)) in individual homes is an important part of PM exposure assessment because individuals spend the majority of time indoors. While F(inf) of fine PM has most commonly been estimated using tracer species such as sulfur, here we evaluate an alternative that does not require particle collection, weighing and compositional analysis, and can be applied in situations with indoor sources of sulfur, such as environmental tobacco smoke, gas pilot lights, and humidifier use. This alternative method involves applying a recursive mass balance model (recursive model, RM) to continuous indoor and outdoor concentration measurements (e.g., light scattering data from nephelometers). We show that the RM can reliably estimate F(inf), a crucial parameter for determining exposure to particles of outdoor origin. The RM F(inf) estimates showed good agreement with the conventional filter-based sulfur tracer approach. Our simulation results suggest that the RM F(inf) estimates are minimally impacted by measurement error. In addition, the average light scattering response per unit mass concentration was greater indoors than outdoors; after correcting for differences in light scattering response the median deviation from sulfur F(inf) was reduced from 15 to 11%. Thus, we have verified the RM applied to light scattering data. We show that the RM method is unable to provide satisfactory estimates of the individual components of F(inf) (penetration efficiency, air exchange rate, and deposition rate). However, this approach may allow F(inf) to be estimated in more residences, including those with indoor sources of sulfur. We show that individual homes vary in their infiltration efficiencies, thereby contributing to exposure misclassification in epidemiological studies that assign exposures using ambient monitoring data. This variation across homes indicates the need for home-specific estimation methods, such as the RM or sulfur tracer, instead of techniques that give average estimates of infiltration across homes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17108894     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  7 in total

1.  Indoor particle dynamics in a school office: determination of particle concentrations, deposition rates and penetration factors under naturally ventilated conditions.

Authors:  X C Cong; J J Zhao; Z Jing; Q G Wang; P F Ni
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Indoor particulate matter in rural, wood stove heated homes.

Authors:  Erin O Semmens; Curtis W Noonan; Ryan W Allen; Emily C Weiler; Tony J Ward
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  Prospective study of particulate air pollution exposures, subclinical atherosclerosis, and clinical cardiovascular disease: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution (MESA Air).

Authors:  Joel D Kaufman; Sara D Adar; Ryan W Allen; R Graham Barr; Matthew J Budoff; Gregory L Burke; Adrian M Casillas; Martin A Cohen; Cynthia L Curl; Martha L Daviglus; Ana V Diez Roux; David R Jacobs; Richard A Kronmal; Timothy V Larson; Sally Lee-Jane Liu; Thomas Lumley; Ana Navas-Acien; Daniel H O'Leary; Jerome I Rotter; Paul D Sampson; Lianne Sheppard; David S Siscovick; James H Stein; Adam A Szpiro; Russell P Tracy
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Modeling Of In-Vehicle Human Exposure to Ambient Fine Particulate Matter.

Authors:  Xiaozhen Liu; H Christopher Frey
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 5.  Statistical methods used to test for agreement of medical instruments measuring continuous variables in method comparison studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rafdzah Zaki; Awang Bulgiba; Roshidi Ismail; Noor Azina Ismail
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Indoor Air Quality Considerations for Laboratory Animals in Wildfire-Impacted Regions-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Adam Schuller; Ethan S Walker; Jaclyn M Goodrich; Matthew Lundgren; Luke Montrose
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-07-12

7.  A new exposure metric for traffic-related air pollution? An analysis of determinants of hopanes in settled indoor house dust.

Authors:  Hind Sbihi; Jeffrey R Brook; Ryan W Allen; Jason H Curran; Sharon Dell; Piush Mandhane; James A Scott; Malcolm R Sears; Padmaja Subbarao; Timothy K Takaro; Stuart E Turvey; Amanda J Wheeler; Michael Brauer
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 5.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.