Literature DB >> 17108574

From bibliometric analysis to research policy: the use of SIGAPS in Lille University Hospital.

Patrick Devos1, Helene Lefranc, Eric Dufresne, Regis Beuscart.   

Abstract

In French hospitals, the progressive setting up of the new rating systems has obliged the university hospitals to justify a certain amount of activities such as research, training or moreover recourse, which are specific missions of the university hospitals. In order to justify research activities, the Lille University Hospital has developed for now three years SIGAPS, a full-web bibliometric software which census and analyse, the scientific publications referenced in the Medline database. After data downloading, each article is classified on a 6 levels "quality scale derived from the impact factors. The system then performs, for a researcher or a team, a report allowing a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Started in Lille in November 2004, the inventory and analysis of data is now ending. For the period 2001-2004, 2814 articles have been published in 700 different journals. The total number of articles increased from 688 in 2001 to 757 in 2004. The mean impact factor was equal to 2.26 and 15.5 % of articles were classified as A, 20.9% as B. Those results confirm the high level of research of the University Hospital of Lille, in agreement with two other national studies which ranks our establishment at the 6th position for medical research activities among the French University Hospitals. Currently a similar evaluation has now began in the 9 other university hospital which have subscribed to the SIGAPS project. We works currently on new indicators as patents, thesis or conferences, or access to other databases as Sciencedirect or Scopus via the RIS format. The next step in the project is the implementation of a meta-base which will federate the information provided by each SIGAPS system. This meta-base will then allow us to perform comparisons between different hospitals, determine the national "sites of excellence" and create some clinical and research networks.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17108574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  4 in total

Review 1.  How has healthcare research performance been assessed?: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vanash M Patel; Hutan Ashrafian; Kamran Ahmed; Sonal Arora; Sejal Jiwan; Jeremy K Nicholson; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  The h-index in medical education: an analysis of medical education journal editorial boards.

Authors:  Asif Doja; Kaylee Eady; Tanya Horsley; M Dylan Bould; J Charles Victor; Margaret Sampson
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Importance of Quality Assessment in Clinical Research in Japan.

Authors:  Rieko Ueda; Yuji Nishizaki; Yasuhiro Homma; Shoji Sanada; Toshiaki Otsuka; Shinji Yasuno; Kotone Matsuyama; Naotake Yanagisawa; Masashi Nagao; Kazutoshi Fujibayashi; Shuko Nojiri; Yumiko Seo; Natsumi Yamada; Patrick Devos; Hiroyuki Daida
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Fate of protocols submitted to a French national funding scheme: a cohort study.

Authors:  Evelyne Decullier; Laure Huot; François R Chapuis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.