Literature DB >> 17108473

Adjacent segment disc pressures following two-level cervical disc replacement versus simulated anterior cervical fusion.

Eric B Laxer1, Bruce V Darden, Daniel B Murrey, R Alden Milam, Alfred L Rhyne, Brian Claytor, Donna S Nussman, Timothy W Powers, Matthew A Davies, S Chad Bryant, Scott P Larsen, Meghal Bhatt, John Brodziak, Jelena Polic.   

Abstract

Anterior cervical fusion (ACF) has been shown to alter the biomechanics of adjacent segments of the cervical spine. The goal of total disc replacement is to address pathology at a given disc with minimal disruption of the operated or adjacent segments. This study compares the pressure within discs adjacent to either a two-level simulated ACDF or a two-level total disc replacement with the ProDisc-C. A special automated motion testing apparatus was constructed. Four fresh cadaveric cervical spine specimens were affixed to the test stand and tested in flexion and extension under specific loads. Intradiscal, miniature strain-gauge-based transducers were placed in the discs above and below the "treated" levels. The specimens were then tested in flexion and extension. Pressure and overall angular displacement were measured. In the most extreme and highest quality specimen the difference at C3/C4 registered 800 kPa and the difference at C6/C7 registered 50 kPa. This same quality specimen treated with the ProDisc reached a flexion angle at much lower moments, 24.3 degrees at 5 N-m, when compared to the the SACF 12.2 degrees at 8.6 N-m. Therefore, the moment needed to achieve 15 degrees of flexion with the SACF treatment was 5.5 N-m and the ProDisc treatment was only 2.9 N-m. This initial data would indicate that adjacent level discs experience substantially lower pressure after two-level disc replacement when compared to two-level SACF. Additional testing to further support these observations is ongoing.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17108473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  8 in total

1.  Use of a personalized hybrid biomechanical model to assess change in lumbar spine function with a TDR compared to an intact spine.

Authors:  Gregory G Knapik; Ehud Mendel; William S Marras
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison between single- and multi-level patients: clinical and radiological outcomes 2 years after cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  J Huppert; J Beaurain; J P Steib; P Bernard; T Dufour; I Hovorka; J Stecken; P Dam-Hieu; J M Fuentes; J M Vital; T Vila; L Aubourg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Segmental Motion of Cervical Arthroplasty Leads to Decreased Adjacent-Level Degeneration: Analysis of the 7-Year Postoperative Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Spivak; Jack E Zigler; Travis Philipp; Michael Janssen; Bruce Darden; Kris Radcliff
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-02-17

Review 4.  Cervical and Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty: A Review of Current Implant Design and Outcomes.

Authors:  Ian J Wellington; Cameron Kia; Ergin Coskun; Barrett B Torre; Christopher L Antonacci; Michael R Mancini; John P Connors; Sean M Esmende; Heeren S Makanji
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-23

Review 5.  Multi-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus single-level CDA for the treatment of cervical disc diseases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hua Zhao; Lei Cheng; Yong Hou; Yi Liu; Ben Liu; Jyoti Joshi Mundra; Lin Nie
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Anterior spinal instrumentation combining a prosthetic disc nucleus with a flexible stabilization device: Manufacture and use in intervertebral disc repair.

Authors:  Da Bao; Dawei Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 7.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Shihua Zou; Junyi Gao; Bin Xu; Xiangdong Lu; Yongbin Han; Hui Meng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Radiological Changes in Adjacent and Index Levels after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jun Jae Shin; Kwang-Ryeol Kim; Dong Wuk Son; Dong Ah Shin; Seong Yi; Keung-Nyun Kim; Do-Heum Yoon; Yoon Ha
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 2.759

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.