Literature DB >> 17108178

Boundary completion is automatic and dissociable from shape discrimination.

Micah M Murray1, Michelle L Imber, Daniel C Javitt, John J Foxe.   

Abstract

Normal visual perception readily overcomes suboptimal or degraded viewing conditions through perceptual filling-in processes, enhancing object recognition and discrimination abilities. This study used visual evoked potential (VEP) recordings in conjunction with electrical neuroimaging analyses to determine the spatiotemporal brain dynamics of boundary completion and shape discrimination processes in healthy humans performing the so-called "thin/fat" discrimination task (Ringach and Shapley, 1996) with stimuli producing illusory contours. First, results suggest that boundary completion processes occur independent of subjects' accuracy on the discrimination task. Modulation of the VEP to the presence versus absence of illusory contours [the IC effect (Murray et al., 2002)] was indistinguishable in terms of response magnitude and scalp topography over the 124-186 ms poststimulus period, regardless of whether task performance was correct. This suggests that failure on this discrimination task is not primarily a consequence of failed boundary completion. Second, the electrophysiological correlates of thin/fat shape discrimination processes are temporally dissociable from those of boundary completion, occurring during a substantially later phase of processing (approximately 330-406 ms). The earlier IC effect was unaffected by whether the perceived contour produced a thin or fat shape. In contrast, later time periods of the VEP modulated according to perceived shape only in the case of stimuli producing illusory contours, but not for control stimuli for which performance was at near-chance levels. Collectively, these data provide further support for a multistage model of object processing under degraded viewing conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17108178      PMCID: PMC6674876          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3225-06.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  29 in total

1.  The development of audiovisual multisensory integration across childhood and early adolescence: a high-density electrical mapping study.

Authors:  Alice B Brandwein; John J Foxe; Natalie N Russo; Ted S Altschuler; Hilary Gomes; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Learning-induced plasticity in auditory spatial representations revealed by electrical neuroimaging.

Authors:  Lucas Spierer; Eric Tardif; Holger Sperdin; Micah M Murray; Stephanie Clarke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Acuity-independent effects of visual deprivation on human visual cortex.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Mark W Pettet; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Pitting binding against selection--electrophysiological measures of feature-based attention are attenuated by Gestalt object grouping.

Authors:  Adam C Snyder; Ian C Fiebelkorn; John J Foxe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Is interpolation cognitively encapsulated? Measuring the effects of belief on Kanizsa shape discrimination and illusory contour formation.

Authors:  Brian P Keane; Hongjing Lu; Thomas V Papathomas; Steven M Silverstein; Philip J Kellman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-03-20

6.  Decoding information about dynamically occluded objects in visual cortex.

Authors:  Gennady Erlikhman; Gideon P Caplovitz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Electrophysiological correlates of learning-induced modulation of visual motion processing in humans.

Authors:  Viktor Gál; István Kóbor; Eva M Bankó; Lajos R Kozák; John T Serences; Zoltán Vidnyánszky
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The neural correlates of visuospatial perceptual and oculomotor extrapolation.

Authors:  Marc Tibber; Ayse Pinar Saygin; Simon Grant; Dean Melmoth; Geraint Rees; Michael Morgan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Early, low-level auditory-somatosensory multisensory interactions impact reaction time speed.

Authors:  Holger F Sperdin; Céline Cappe; John J Foxe; Micah M Murray
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-11

10.  Applying an attentional set to perceived and remembered features.

Authors:  Duncan Edward Astle; Anna Christina Nobre; Gaia Scerif
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.