H Shemesh1, M-K Wu, P R Wesselink. 1. Department of Cariology Endodontology Pedodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands. h.shemesh@acta.nl
Abstract
AIM: To compare two different experimental models when measuring leakage along root fillings with or without smear layer. METHODOLOGY:One hundred and twenty single-rooted teeth were prepared to size 50 and allocated to two groups: fluid transport model (n = 60) and glucose penetration model (n = 60). The roots in each group were divided into three subgroups of 20 teeth each. Smear layer was left in place in group 1 but removed in groups 2 and 3. In groups 1 and 2 canals were filled with laterally compacted gutta-percha cones and AH 26. Group 3 was laterally compacted with Resilon cones and Epiphany sealer. The coronal portion of the filling was removed to assure only 4 mm of filling remained in the canal. Leakage of glucose was evaluated by measuring its concentration once a week for a total period of 56 days using a glucose penetration model. Fluid transport was evaluated by measuring the movement of an air-bubble using a fluid transport model, 1 and 8 weeks after canal filling. Differences between the groups in glucose concentrations and fluid transport were statistically analysed with the Kruskal-Wallis and the Mann-Whitney tests. The level of significance was set at alpha = 0.05. RESULTS:Glucose penetration was significantly different between the three groups after the first 8 days (P < 0.05). Resilon leaked the most throughout the experiment period. No significant difference (P > 0.05) existed between the two gutta-percha groups at all time intervals (Mann-Whitney test). In the fluid transportation model, no statistically significant differences were observed between all three experimental groups (P > 0.05) at either 1 or 8 weeks after filling (Kruskal-Wallis test). CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, the glucose penetration model was more sensitive in detecting leakage along root fillings. Removing the smear layer before filling did not improve the sealing of the apical 4 mm of filling. Resilon allowed more glucose penetration but the same amount of fluid transport as the gutta-percha root fillings.
RCT Entities:
AIM: To compare two different experimental models when measuring leakage along root fillings with or without smear layer. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and twenty single-rooted teeth were prepared to size 50 and allocated to two groups: fluid transport model (n = 60) and glucose penetration model (n = 60). The roots in each group were divided into three subgroups of 20 teeth each. Smear layer was left in place in group 1 but removed in groups 2 and 3. In groups 1 and 2 canals were filled with laterally compacted gutta-percha cones and AH 26. Group 3 was laterally compacted with Resilon cones and Epiphany sealer. The coronal portion of the filling was removed to assure only 4 mm of filling remained in the canal. Leakage of glucose was evaluated by measuring its concentration once a week for a total period of 56 days using a glucose penetration model. Fluid transport was evaluated by measuring the movement of an air-bubble using a fluid transport model, 1 and 8 weeks after canal filling. Differences between the groups in glucose concentrations and fluid transport were statistically analysed with the Kruskal-Wallis and the Mann-Whitney tests. The level of significance was set at alpha = 0.05. RESULTS:Glucose penetration was significantly different between the three groups after the first 8 days (P < 0.05). Resilon leaked the most throughout the experiment period. No significant difference (P > 0.05) existed between the two gutta-percha groups at all time intervals (Mann-Whitney test). In the fluid transportation model, no statistically significant differences were observed between all three experimental groups (P > 0.05) at either 1 or 8 weeks after filling (Kruskal-Wallis test). CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, the glucose penetration model was more sensitive in detecting leakage along root fillings. Removing the smear layer before filling did not improve the sealing of the apical 4 mm of filling. Resilon allowed more glucose penetration but the same amount of fluid transport as the gutta-percha root fillings.
Authors: Guido Migliau; Afrah Ali Abdullah Sofan; Eshrak Ali Abdullah Sofan; Salvatore Cosma; Stefano Eramo; Livio Gallottini Journal: Ann Stomatol (Roma) Date: 2014-11-20
Authors: Yan Huang; Berkan Celikten; Karla de Faria Vasconcelos; Laura Ferreira Pinheiro Nicolielo; Nicholas Lippiatt; Arda Buyuksungur; Reinhilde Jacobs; Kaan Orhan Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Marcus Stoetzer; Martin Ruecker; Andreas Koch; Dirk Ziebolz; Horst Kokemüller; Christina Kaempf; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Constantin von See Journal: ISRN Dent Date: 2012-10-15